|
Origin of
Surnames
Primitive personal
names doubtless originated soon after the invention of spoken language,
in the unrecorded ages long preceding modern history. For thousands
of years first, or given names, were the only designations that
men and women bore; and at the dawn of recorded historic times,
when the world was less crowded than it is today and every man knew
his neighbors, one title of address was sufficient. Only gradually,
with the passing centuries and the increasing complexity of civilized
society, did a need arise for. more specific designations.
As early as
Biblical times certain distinguishing characteristics were occasionally
used in addition to the given name, as, for instance, Swein Forkbeard,
Harold Bluetooth, Joshua the son of Nun, Azariah the son of Nathan,
Judas of Galilee, and Simon the Zealot. In ancient Greece a daughter
was named after her father, as Chryseis, daughter of Chryses; and
a son's name was often an enlargement for of his father's, as Hieronymus
son of Hiero.
The Chinese
were the first to adopt surnames to honor their forebears, with
the family name placed first, rather than last. Thus, the family
name of Sun Yat-sen is Sun.
The Romans,
with the rise of their civilization, met the need for hereditary
designations by inventing a complex system whereby every patrician
took several names - given-name + clan-name + family-name - about
300 B.C.. None of them, however, exactly corresponded to surnames
as we know them, for the "clan name", although hereditary, was given
also to slaves and other dependents. Examples are the Claudians,
the house of Tiberias and the Julians. This system proved to be
but a temporary innovation; the overthrow of the Western Empire
by Celtic and Germanic barbarian invaders brought about its end
and a reversion to the primitive custom of a single name.
The ancient
Scandinavians, and for the most part the Germans and the Celts,
had only individual names, and there were no family names, strictly
speaking. But as family and tribal groups grew in size, individual
names became inadequate and the need for supplementary designations
began to be felt. Among the first employed were such terms as the
Hardy, the Stern, the Dreadful-in-Battle; and the nations of northern
Europe soon adopted the practice of adding the father's name to
the son's, as Oscar son of Carnuth and Dermid son of Duthno.
The practice
of attaching a word to help identify a man was resurrected in Venice
and spread first to France, then England, then Germany -- then to
the rest of Europe. (Most of Europe, anyway...) In the English-speaking
part of the world, the exact date that surnames began to be adopted
can't be pinpointed, however, during the reign of Edward the Confessor
(1042-1066) there were Saxon tenants in Suffolk bearing such names
as Suert Magno, Stigand Soror, Siuward Rufus, and Leuric Hobbesune
(Hobson). The use of 'surnames' was quite extensive among the Norman
nobility, and the Norman conquest saw a more formally introduced.
In 1086 when
William the Conqueror compiled the Domesday Book he made the essential
that all of those mentioned had a surname. So many people took on
locality and patronymic names.
The surname
used in the Domesday Book were not true hereditary surnames are
not considered to have been commonplace until the late 1200's and
by the end of the twelfth century hereditary names had become common
in England.
British surnames
became fixed in the period between 1250 and 1450. But even as late
as 1465 they were not universal. The broad range of ethnic and linguistic
roots for British surnames reflects the history of Britain as an
oft-invaded land. These roots include, but are not limited to, Old
English, Middle English, Old French, Old Norse, Irish, Gaelic, Celtic,
Pictish, Welsh, Gaulish, Germanic, Latin, Greek and Hebrew.
During the reign
of Edward V a law was passed to compel certain Irish to adopt surnames
as a method to track and control them more: "They shall take unto
them a Surname, either of some Town, or some Color, as Black or
Brown, or some Art or Science, as Smyth or Carpenter, or some Office,
as Cooke or Butler." And as late as the beginning of the nineteenth
century a similar decree compelling Jews in Germany and Austria
to add a German surname to the single names that they had previously
used.
William Camden
wrote in Remaines of a Greater Worke Concerning Britaine: (1586):
"About the yeare of our Lord 1000...surnames began to be taken
up in France, and in England about the time of the Conquest, or
else a very little before, under King Edward the Confessor, who
was all Frenchified...but the French and we termed them Surnames,
not because they are the names of the sire, or the father, but because
they are super added to Christian names as the Spanish called them
Renombres, as Renames.
Types of
Surnames
A surname is a name added to a baptismal or given name for the purposes
of making it more specific and of indicating family relationship
or descent. Classified according to origin, most surnames fall into
four general groups:It is easier to understand the story of the
development of our institution of surnames if these classifications
are borne in mind
| |
|
Those
taking -- or based on -- the first name of the ancestor's father
(patronymic) |
| |
|
Those
nicknames that describe the
ancestor's face, figure, temper, morals, or habits. |
| |
|
Those
derived from locality or
place of residence; |
| |
|
Those
derived from occupation
or Status of the ancestor |
Surname Origin
Types
In some cases it is clear which origin type a certain surname is.
However many surnames are not so easily classified. Some may have
several seperate origins, having been derived from more than one
original name.
| |
|
Monogenetic
names evolved from a single origin - These surnames can be traced
back to a single person or sept from whom the name originally
arose. Examples of monogenetic names are O’Callaghan, Doherty
and Crowley |
| |
|
Polygenetic
names evolved from multiple separate origins - The same surname
may have arisen in different areas of the country completely
seperately. Alternatively different names may have gradually
been distorted and merged. This sometimes occurs when a common
surname engulfs other less common ones of similar sound. Examples
of polygenetic names are Murphy, O’Flynn and O’Connor |
Name Variations
Some
surnames of today which seem to defy classification or explanation
are corruptions of ancient forms that have become disguised almost
beyond recognition.
For instance,
Troublefield was originally Tuberville; Wrinch was Renshaw; Diggles
was Douglas; Sinnocks and Snooks were Sevenoaks; Barrowcliff and
Berrycloth were Barraclough; and Strawbridge was Stourbridge; Such
corruptions of family names, resulting from ignorance of spelling,
variations in pronunciation, or merely from the preference of the
bearer, tend to baffle both the genealogist and the etymologist.
Shakespeare's
name is found in some twenty-seven different forms, and the majority
of English and Anglo-American surnames have, in their history, appeared
in four to a dozen or more variant spellings. For example the German
family Winegar that came to North America in the Palatine Migration
of 1709 has their name listed in various lists as Winegar, Wenniger,
Winneger, Weyniger, Wyniger, Weneger, Winiger and Wienneger.
In Australia
and the United States there is a great variety of family names,
with surnames of every religion, race and nation are represented.
While a substantial number are of English, Scotch, Irish, Welsh,
and western European origin, brought to this country by scions of
families that had borne these names for generations prior to emigration,
many others have come from central and southern Europe and the Slavic
countries, where the use of surnames is generally a more recently
established practice. Some families had no fixed surname until after
their arrival; and in other cases emigrants from continental Europe
or their descendants have translated or otherwise modified their
names. These factors contribute to the difficulties encountered
by students of etymology and family history.
While the name,
in its origin, may seem ingenious, humble, surprising, or matter-of-fact,
its significance today lies not in a literal interpretation of its
initial meaning but in the many things that have happened to it
since it first came into use. In the beginning it was only a label
to distinguish one John from his neighbor John who lived across
the field. But soon it established itself as part of the bearer's
individuality; and as it passed to his children, his children's
children, and their children, it became the symbol not of one man
but of a family and all that that family stood for. Handed down
from generation to generation, the surname grew inseparably associated
with the achievement, the tradition, and the prestige of the family.
Like the coat of arms - that vivid symbolization of the name which
warrior ancestors bore in battle - the name itself has become a
badge of family honor. It has become the "good name" to be proud
of and to protect as one's most treasured possession.
|