The basis of the concept is that the universe has evolved from an origin of absolutely nothing. No matter or energy, no time or dimension, evolving from absolute non existence. Every attempt to comprehend the pre-universe always breaks down because there is absolutely nothing to comprehend. However, trying to comprehend infinity is no less a challenge. But one thing that is certain is that (what we assume would be) infinity and a point of (what we assume to be) zero dimension are integral parts of our universe. Those two parameters become relative as the universe evolves.

The initial consequence of the zero origin is that the time required to start the ball rolling from the stationary time rate of non existence is an eternity. The universe, right from the infinitesimally minute origin, has always been of infinite proportions.

In order to create the very first signs of existence, there would need to have been some disturbance which disrupted the "state" of non existence. Non existence can be considered a state because it became relative to existence the instant time began. Whatever the cause of the initial disturbance it cannot possibly be explained, but due to its infinitesimally minor origin it's infinitely more logical than any theory that requires some kind of eternally existing stuff of indeterminate origin as the base on which to build a universe. Such a theory exists on an astral plane with nothing whatever supporting it.

Prior to the initial disturbance, "before" the beginning of time, the state of non existence was necessarily in absolute balance. The initial disturbance was necessarily drawn from that absolute balance equally to "either side" of non existence. The only possible "sides" are necessarily absolute opposites, creating some kind of direction and dimension for them to be relative in, with the non existent state as the focal point to which they would both need to be returned to remove the imbalance. The origin of the universe could only stem from the one initial disturbance. Multiple disturbances would need to be relative to each other in some kind of dimension that would not yet exist, and that would be impossible.

The fact that the universe has evolved beyond the one disturbance is proof that the initial disturbance was not annulled, but has carried on to generate countless other disturbances of the same nature. Each being the origin of its own past universe.

Figure (1) of the next image represents one side of the disturbance, being the negative dimension, which is leaving the past behind in a lesser dimension than its infinite origin in the present. Figure (2) represents the other side of the disturbance, the positive dimension, which is leaving the past behind in a greater dimension than its point origin in the present. Each of these forces will always remain the origin of their respective past dimensions.

The origin of the positive dimension is a point, while the origin of the negative dimension is infinity. If the two realms are overlaid on each other, as in diagram (3), time distances between the dimensional origins appear to reduce any relationship between the disturbances to zero. But that's not so at all. The origin of each dimension is the same non existent state from which they are equally drawn into opposite dimensions. They are drawn to each other through the window of non existence in the quest to combine with their counterpart on the other side in an attempt to reset the balance and return from whence they came. But that attraction direction is false. The imbalance is maintained by this false attraction, forever. The only way back to non existence is for them to be infinitely separated. Only then would they cease to exist.

If the origin of the positive dimension is a point, so too is the origin of the negative dimension as seen from the positive dimension. If the origin of the negative dimension is infinity, so too is the origin of the positive dimension from the viewpoint in the negative dimension.

Specifying zero size or infinite size for the origins of dimension is illogical. The dimensions which extend from those points are designating them a zero and infinite size, but neither can exist in any kind of dimension. They are always the origin of their own dimension, in the present, with their direction being defined from the past.

Because the positive side of the disturbance in one pair is constantly advancing into the negative dimension in pursuit of it's counterpart, while still remaining the origin of the past dimension that it's creating, it's leaving the past behind at the speed at which it's advancing, and nothing else will ever enter its past dimension because the same laws will also apply for everything else that exists as well. Everything will be drawing away from everything else at the rate of advance into the negative dimension, which is the speed of light at the time. But the negative side of the disturbance is also drawing from non existence at the same rate, but into the positive dimension, which is in the opposite direction to the positive side of the disturbance. The focal point of the charge force relationship, being the non existent state, is simultaneously carried in opposite directions. The positive and negative past dimensions are necessarily still retreating from that relationship at the speed of light, but the focal point in the relationship is now generally fixed relative to anything else that could likewise exist.

The origins of the two dimensions are seen as point size from the viewpoint in the past of the positive dimension, and as infinity from the viewpoint in the past of the negative dimension. Both views are absolutely separated from the present. The false directions of attraction are inward beyond a point and outward beyond the absolute maximum size respectively. But from each side, the view through the window of non existence to the other side would be reversed. THAT'S WHAT NEGATIVE MEANS. It's clearly not going to be unaffected. The inward attraction direction in the positive dimension is reversed to point outward when it enters the negative realm, and vice versa from the negative viewpoint. To put it another way; from the viewpoint in the positive dimension the pasts in the two dimensions both extend outward as one combined dimension, and from the viewpoint in the negative dimension the pasts in the two dimensions both extend inward as one combined dimension.

The direction of the global advance toward the future shown in diagram (1) is inward, into a negative dimension, while the advance shown in diagram (2) is outward from the negative origin, which (correctly) sets the past in a negative dimension. The positive origin of dimension is globally drawing away from all else in the universe at the current rate of existence, or speed of light, while the negative origin is globally advancing toward all else at the same rate.

The three dimensions of the universe don't exist just because they do. If there were 4, or 2, we would accept that fact without question. But the question still remains, and there must always be a reason for everything. "Well, that's how it is." is no reason. Why does light from a point source diverge in two lateral dimensions around its line of propagation? Why does all matter in the universe exist in three dimensions?

How did the big bang universe get to have three dimensions?

The e- and e+ charges which are labeled electron and positron are the two sides of the disturbance. They are each the origin of their own dimension and are both point sized in the positive dimension. Electrons and positrons fill the roles of the opposite sides of the disturbance with a precision that is far too precise to be coincidence. But I can't attach the label of electron or positron to either side because I have no idea which is which, but every one of them is the focal point of its very own part of the universe.

Currently accepted theory is that when a pair of electrons and positrons are drawn together they are converted to E/M energy and completely removed from existence, which falsifies this theory if true. But the fact that they can both be resurrected out of nowhere by an E/M packet carrying the same or greater energy than the combined pair is fairly conclusive evidence that it's not true at all. How can E/M radiation possibly know how to make an electron or positron? How does it determine how much charge goes into each before the creation process turns off, leaving any excess radiation to carry on as normal? How can it possible carry that kind of information?

Apart from the background radiation (CMBR), all that we can perceive of the past universe, was in a fairly advanced state of evolution at the time. That applies even if the radiation from those stars is barely distinguishable from the CMBR. The frequency spectrum generated by the stars in that era is still a long way from 0 hz, and the proportionality between the speed of light, time and everything else in that realm would still be as it is today. A static recording of every electromagnetic interaction at the time was left behind with the stationary past. The static recording continues to coincide with the moving present today, and it of course appears to be redshifted. But that's only because the current universe is blueshifted relative to then.

There is no expansion in the zero origin universe. It has evolved from zero temperature to what it is today. What is interpreted as redshift is the actual temperature of everything in the universe at the time.

We can only perceive the present from a viewpoint in the past because the only mechanism by which we can view anything, extends into dimension, regardless of which dimension the view is taken from.

Light is always in motion relative to matter, or matter is always in motion relative to light. Both statements may be true, but the latter is the reality. Light only exists as a static recording in the past, until matter comes along and interacts with it. The question of how light propagates doesn't even arise.

As the universe evolves, the increasing e- and e+ charge attractions draw them into a deeper void of dimension, drawing away from their immediate pasts at an ever increasing rate. There is no limit to how deep that void can go. The depth of dimension is increasing, but there's no expansion. The rate of attraction into each opposite dimension, sets the depth of past dimension in its own void. If that depth is increased, so too is the rate at which it advances into the future. Nothing really changes.

The apparent expansion rate of the big bang universe is specified by the Hubble constant. It gives the expansion rate as around 74000 m/sec per Mpc. 1 parsec is the distance that light will travel in 3.26 years, so 1 Mpc is the distance that light travels in 3260000 years. Since the speed of light is presumed to have been constant throughout the expansion, the visible limit of the universe is; 3e8 / 74000 = 4054 Mpc, which is 4054 * 3260000 = 13.2 billion light years. At that distance in the past from every observation point in the universe, the expansion rate has reached the speed at which the light from that era is moving outward toward all observers, wherever in the universe they may be, and can never reach them.

But that's not how it works in the zero origin universe. The visible limit to the universe is determined by its rate of evolution, which is currently setting infinity at around 13 billion light years, as measured at the current speed of light, which is the rate at which the two opposites are drawn into each other's dimension. The Hubble Constant gives the expansion rate as 74000 m/sec per Mpc in time, but that represents a light speed increase of 74000 m/sec per Mpc in the zero origin universe.

If the current rate of evolution was almost absolute zero, i.e. a near zero Hubble Constant, the visible limit of the universe would appear to be infinity, and we would be fried by the background radiation.

Back in the real universe, the difference between a 1 light-second length today and an equivalent 1 light-second length in the early universe is enormous. e.g. It takes 1 second to cover 3e+8 meters today, while it took 1 second to cover a 1 meter length at the time when the speed of light was 1 m/sec, relative to now. According to our time rate, 3e+8 meters back then is still 1 meter. Infinity becomes near zero distance to us back when the speed of light was almost zero, very close to the origin of the universe. The observation will always be relative.

The ultimate goal of the zero origin universe is an instantaneous evolution rate and a zero visible limit for dimension, where zero dimension and infinite dimension will, very wrongly, coincide. But that goal will always remain an eternity away, so long as that observation is made from within the current realm at the time. From our viewpoint now, progress toward that goal would exponentially increase. That's how the current rate of evolution would be observed from a viewpoint in what was the very early universe, on the very edge of what we perceive as the visible limit.

As the universe evolves, everything that exists is being slowly but surely drawn into a deepening void of dimension, where both the speed of light and time increase. They are one and the same.

The evolving universe is perhaps progressing toward singularities everywhere. Within each singularity, everything that exists (in the matter world) would be housed within an instantaneously infinite dimension. So there is room for infinite numbers of singularities to develop within the immediately infinite space, everywhere, and they will all be absolutely removed from each other.

The above paragraph is wrong. There can be only one universe because from the viewpoint taken from anywhere in the current universe, the infinite limit of the entire universe is housed within what we perceive as the 13 billion light year visible limit of dimension. It's always the same universe.

Whatever the case, the development direction is certain. Everything that exists is on a one way journey into an ever deepening turmoil, for eternity. And there is no way out. The zero origin universe is truly the universe from hell.

Life is hope, so long as there's not too much of it.