THE OTWAYS TREES - MASSIVE TRUNKS & HEIGHTS!

While most of the Mountain Ash in Victoria is located in the east of the state, a large pocket of Mountain Ash existed in isolation in the west in what is now known as the Otway Ranges.

The Otways which are located approximately two hours drive from Melbourne have over 2m of average rainfall per year. This abundance of water meant spectacular dense forest and absolutely huge trees with massive girth and height. Although never formally recorded by surveyors, several trees were estimated at 110 to 120m in height. It appears that great height and size of the trees was so common that despite community interest in them - most were cleared. Many were used as houses, barns, stables as you can see in the photos below. When you see a "big tree" today just compare it to what was really a big one a hundred years ago!



OLDMANTREE

(click on image for a bigger picture) - Image courtesy of the Knox Collection/R.H. Knox Collection (Colac Historical Society)

The above image proves that the trees 100 years back were certainly much bigger than their current day counterparts and hence could've been considerably taller given their optimum growing conditions. We know from recent accurate laser measurements in Tasmania that the tallest tree there is 99m (325 feet). It is therefore distinctly possible trees in the 110-120m height range did exist!


GENERALSHERMAN

LEFT:  A masterpiece of nature. Affectionately known as the "Old Man Tree"" this photo taken in 1895 at Beech Forest is of one of their bigger trees. John Birrer Snr  & Jnr and  Mr. Mckay a teacher strike a puny pose in front of an awe inspiring trunk. Unfortunately we have no measurements on this massive tree from this date except for its 78 feet (23.8 metre) girth at the base.

Many people have disputed the early settler's measurements of heights and diameters/girths of these trees. We can perform a simple experiment with this photo to test the accuracy of this measurement by using the people in this photo.

Even though we don't know their height the average height of a male back then was about 170cm (5' 6").  Unlike today, people six foot and over were extremely rare due to the poor nutrition available. Measuring across the base of the tree it is approximately four people in diameter. This means the tree is about 6.8m in diameter. While trees are not perfectly round we can estimate its circumference (girth) from Pythagoras' theorem of 2xPIExRADIUS. This gives us an approximate circumference of  21.4m (70 feet). We can compare this with the historical measurement of 78 feet and we can see it comes quite close. As the Mountain Ash usually had large buttressed roots around its base (meaning it had bulges and wasn't perfectly circular) we can see the quoted measurement is quite valid.

This is a great photo as we get an idea on the size and possible height of such a tree. The trunk doesn't appear to taper much in the first in the first 10m and its diameter is still approximately four metres at ten metres above the ground!

We can only guess at its height but it is very possible it was 100 metres plus. Again we can use Pythagoras's' theorem to get a rough idea of a volume such a tree could've had. Allowing for some tapering of its trunk (we could assume the 4m diameter extended up to 50m high and then tapered to 0.5m at its top) the volume of wood in this tree could've easily been 700 cubic metres. Depending on the amount of trunk tapering, this volume could easily be higher!

This compares with the height of 79 metres and a measly volume of 439 cubic metres of "El Grande" - the currently largest (not tallest) Mountain Ash found recently in Tasmania and accidentally ddestroyed during logging operations.

LEFT (colour photo): In comparison the General Sherman Sequoia Gigantea pictured left is generally believed to be the largest living organism on earth. It has been measured at 84m in height, has 11.1m base diameter and a base circumference of 31.1m. This gives the tree a calculated volume of approximately 1400 cubic metres! I have tried to scale the photo so the people are roughly the same size for comparison between the two trees.

Which tree is bigger - the Sequoia Gigantea or the Mountain Ash? Could the "Old Man Tree have been bigger than the General Sherman.....?


OTWAYTREE80FOOTCIRCUMFERENCE
(click on image for a bigger picture) - Image courtesy of the Knox Collection/R.H. Knox Collection (Colac Historical Society)







LEFT: Another beauty in 1889, this time 80 feet (24.4m) in circumference at the base. Unfortunately height unknown.

STABLETREESMALL
(click on image for a bigger picture) - Image courtesy of the Knox Collection/R.H. Knox Collection (Colac Historical Society)




A more well known photo of Mr John Gardner, one of the founders of Beech Forest using a big tree for a stable. The height of tree when growing is unknown, but base diameter was approximately 7m and it could hold five horses. It was common practice for the big trees to be used as houses, sheds and even churches by the early settlers!

OTWAYSEESAW
(click on image for a bigger picture) - Image courtesy of the Knox Collection/R.H. Knox Collection (Colac Historical Society)





A giant Mountain Ash see-saw on a farm in Weeaproinah. Note the brave individuals perched on each end!

As well as holding height records, was this the world's biggest see-saw?


BIGMESSMATETREE
(click on image for a bigger picture)
The Last Mohican? The beautiful Melba Gully walk (named after the world famous Australian opera singer) is noted for its glow worms at night and has one of the last big trees in the Otways. In the rain forest a 300 plus year old messmate gives visitors to the area an idea of what the big trees were like in the area. Although it is not a Mountain Ash (several other tree species can reach formidable sizes in Australia) it has a large girth, however it is only "short" (approx. 25m).

This tree would have been considered small back in 1890! If you're careful when you travel through the area you can sometimes spot an old stump on a farm, a reminder of the past.

I visited some nearby Ash forests and found some trees starting to get largish trunks (some to 2m diameter) but many had their tops broken off in a recent storm denting their contention for a future record. Maybe if the rest are left alone and no intense bush fires come through the area........