The irrelevance of parliament


When issues affecting the interests of Big Business arise, Parliament and Councils become irrelevant

We have democratic process for all our day-to-day governance, but when issues arise where big money is concerned, an alternative sinister path is employed where key, influential, members of the bureaucracy influence our elected representatives to implement developers' schemes. Our elected representatives need to be trained to recognise when a dodgy issue comes up, and be able to counter any bad spin they are given. They should also be given good training and incentives to do the right thing, and an even more compelling reason why, if they don’t do the right thing they will lose their rcomfortable status. In short, we must demand that our elected representatives implement governance for the people, and if they don't, we must work towards ousting them and supporting alternative representatives who will.

Good Parliamentary governance is practically impossible without the permission of a very tiny brotherhood of very powerful and corrupt bureaucrats — Implementors — who are masters at distancing themselves from their unscrupulous deeds. Evidence of their machinations is hidden, burned or shredded and even if robust evidence of corruption is found, it is usually couched in obfuscating terms and signed by their heads of departments who know damned well what is going on, but who feign surprised innocence and hand the problem over to their publicly funded lawyers to prove that their underling's black deeds are merely another shade of white. Or if the heat gets too much, the heads of departments claim stress and take early retirement on fat pensions — the poor wealthy blossoms.

It is a sad reality that Parliament and Local Government (Councils) need the cooperation of the bureaucracy more than the bureaucracy needs the cooperation of Parliament and Councils. Parliaments and Councils come and go every few years, but the bureaucrats remain. The problem is that those bureaucrats are necessary to give the good advice to the elected representatives for them to govern in the best interests of their constituents. That they do well in most cases of day-to-day issues. However, when issues that affect Big Business arise, they instead proffer the spin that their governors in Big Business supply. Whether Labor or Liberal gets to have the best seats and social calendar in Spring Street is irrelevant. So unless there is a sudden flush of moral fibre from the ranks of our elected representatives, the endemic corruption within the bureaucracies will continue to fester, immune to transparency and curative measures.

Most bureaucrats are worthy, well-qualified people, of whom we should be justly proud, and who do a good job in matters that don’t affect Big Business. However, when issues that do affect Big Business arise, the small band of powerful, corrupt, Teflon-coated bureaucrats, the Implementors, take charge to serve their real masters, the businessmen. MHRs and Councillors may of course challenge this powerful force of unelected Implementors, but they soon learn that it is at their peril!

“Yes Minister”, well parodies that scene, and it should send a clear warning to the people of the dangers of tokenistic government. However, it also sends the wrong message that such practices are humorously benign — that they are of little consequence.

Sadly, our Parliament is Government in name only. Big Business is the real government, aided and abetted by the well connected and coordinated forces of the powerful Implementors within the bureaucracies and permitted by our elected representatives who dare not seriously challenge the powerful bureaucrats lest those permanently-entrenched wise old bureaucratic villains crush them and take away their enjoyable fringe benefits and the unearned prestige that goes with the job of Councillors or State Parliamentarians.

It’s easier for elected representatives to turn a blind eye to corruption than it is for them to tackle corruption from within their bureaucracies. Councillors dare not risk the arsenal of weapons and the network of Implementors that the bureaucracy has at hand. In State Parliament, it is even worse. Trying to bring a corrupt bureaucracy to heel is too hard a task for most of our elected representatives.

If elected representatives dare to tackle corruption within the bureaucracy they soon find out that they face a Herculean task. They can’t even articulate the problem of which they are part, let alone contemplate the possibility and loss of face of botching the job, of not being able to handle the truth? Their promise to be fearless seekers of the truth and true representatives of the people who elected them normally evaporates upon being elected.

As the old military bureaucrat Colonel Jessep said in the film A Few Good Men “You can’t handle the truth!”

So if any individual or party has the wit to bundle a package that will rid us of this corruptive core and sever the controls it has over Councils and Parliament, I, and a few of my mates who have matured past the Concrete Learning stage will happily vote for that party — even for the Greens. I don’t care if they have two heads, fur or scales — anything that will send the message to the feckless Parties that we need urgent and rigorous surgery in the bureaucracies of Local Council, Spring Street and Canberra.

One may well ask:
• why this small coterie of influential and key members of the bureaucracy would sabotage democratic process when we pay them to instead serve us, the people? The answer to that is probably money or money in kind.
• do our Councillors and Parliamentarians realise the preponderance of dodgy information they are fed, and do they have the skills to evaluate and check the advice their bureaucrats present to them. Or do they fully understand what is going on, but sit back to reap the benefits of sweeping it under the carpet, or at best initiate a sham investigation of the problem? There are obvious ways of testing this, and it is an obligation of everybody to challenge their elected representatives and work to unseat corrupt officers.

... pray that there's intelligent life somewhere out in space, 'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth! (with apologies to Eric Idle’s, "The Galaxy Song,” from Monty Python's The Meaning of Life.)————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Beautiful Melbourne

 

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

You would have to be very naive to believe that the Government valued your opinion!

————————————————————————————————————————

 

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

The Mornington Peninsular sand-mining rorts

They paved paradise and put in a toxic-waste lot. (With apologies to Joni Mitchell)

The Mornington Peninsular is pock-marked with numerous craters. The main soil of this semi-isthmus is a lode of sandy loam from Oakleigh to the Western Port bay, in many places twenty metres deep. Go behind Karkarook park Moorabbin to the "sand mine", sneak through one of the many holes in the fence and be amazed at the depth of one of the richest lodes of the best kind of soils anywhere in the world. And, as a bonus, under much of it is an aquifer that discharges into the Western Port bay.

And what are they doing to this precious resource? Developers buy a whole allotment, dig out the soil in the middle, fill the hole with toxic waste that poisons the aquifer, then cover it, plant a few native trees, then sell the land around for housing. Do the pollies know about this racket? Of course they do? Do they care? Why should they when the developers keep paying them?

People who buy home sites there are blissfully unaware of what they are doing? Go down to one of the rubbish tips and watch how the employees check the toxicity of the rubbish dumped there. "Any toxic material in that load mate?" "Nah — OK, that'll be $30." It's a joke.

The methane gas produced is perhaps the only good thing to happen. This could be easily controlled and turned into an environmentally acceptable money-making asset simply by covering it with heavy plastic, covering the plastic with soil and plants, then piping or bottling the accumulated gas from under the plastic for heating and cooking. But what do they do with this greenhouse gas? They let it stink up the neighbourhood. Great planners this government.


 


Click on the blue hypertexts below for links to more articles


Planning for 2060 when our living will be very different

We have a moral obligation to save our small planet, humanity itself and every other living species! So what is so particularly precious about human life that is destroying everthing else? There is little time left for us to plan for living without electricity or any the other energy sources we take for granted?

How many people

A Convenient lie
Global Warming and Global Cooling are natural unstoppable cycles. There have been much hotter Global temperatures in the past. If the carbonists wanted to reduce their claimed extra warming effect they would have to reduce the demand for energy, and that consequently means reducing the number of people demanding energy — one of those kinds of difficult problems that politicians just don’t have the guts to tackle, so they create imaginary targets like carbon dioxide.

When Growth is NOT good
Australian population is already beyond the ecological carrying capacity of the land. We need growth, but not growth of population, but of wisdom and maturity and the kind of planning that goes with wisdom and maturity. Unless Parliament seizes back Government from the Gordon Geckos they will soon own Australia absolutely.

 

How government works
— of course, not our government

It only takes a handful of well-positioned Implementors who brief the ministers to usurp government



What is the difference between a Ponzi money scam and the Stimulus scheme?
Answer: None, because they both gamble good money in a futile hope of getting a greater return, Ponzi is private enterprise’s word for it, Stimulus is government’s.

 

How they are getting rid of Port Phillip Bay's beaches
For a billion dollars the Labor Party is getting rid of Port Phillip Bay sand and all of Melbourne’s beaches. That’s the cost of breaching the reef — the rip — and letting the sand of the bay spill down into the Bass Strait.

A win-win solution to house the three million migrants the Labor Party is bringing to Melbourne to enrich our lives — a Laboropolis for Victoria.
Most Melbournians would support a creation of a separate, nearby city of 2,499,945 immigrants plus the 55 Labor parliamentarians who hate Melbourne as it is.

Our United nations problem
Let us define what a refugee is before we become refugees in our own country.

Afghanistan
Afghanistan isn’t about the Taliban, Islam or Democracy, it’s all about Big Business’s control over the world-wide illegal drug trade.

You cannot objectively test the stuff that pupils learn from good teaching
Whilst you can objectively test and rank students’ knowledge, teaching is far more than imparting knowledge and the kind of stuff that matters — learning — cannot be objectively tested. Testing students is a waste of teachers’ precious time and resources. It is onerous and the results are of no educational use whatsoever.

Madden
Stupidity or Careful Planning
An intelligent minister is a liabiliy for a corrupt government.

Legal Thievery
Shareholders just don't yet get it, their shares don't matter, the thieves have stolen so much of the company's wealth and have used it to buy the majority of shares with their heist— their obscene salaries and bonuses!

Climate Change — Why global warming happens, and what are the causal factors?
No respectable scientist would dare venture a causal link.

The Earth has cycles of being hotter and cooler and some temperature maxima having been more extreme than others. Whilst scientists know much about the effects of these cycles on climate, and have theories and evidence such as solar fuel changes, sunspots, galactic events, orbits of planets and asteroids. However, why global warming happens, and what are the causal factors, no respectable scientist would dare venture a causal link.

 

The IPCC isn't part of the solution,
it's part of the problem.
One might well ask why doesn't IPCC establish whether carbon dioxide is the causal factor, instead of accepting that it is without there being a skerrik of evidence? And why are only the minor greenhouse gases vilified, and of them why is carbon dioxide targeted. And why is the major greenhouse gas, water vapour, barely mentioned?


Bullshit Bingo
Do you keep falling asleep at political meetings and seminars? Here's a way to change all of that.


What a Single Dwelling Isn't
If there is no definition of what constitutes a "Single Dwelling" then it follows thatBuilding Surveyors have no domain. Does the government have the desire or wit to solve this problem?
In your dreams!

Pledging
Pledging to get rid of useless politicians
If your sitting Member doesn't obey you NOW, pledge to campaign against in the next elections, no matter what happens.


A Taxonomy for decision-making at VCAT
The use of a taxonomical system for judging the worth of a proposal at VCAT could provide a better, more efficient, rigorous, transparent system ≠ to justify or repudiate the worth of a proposition.


Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player


A flag for Australia
Put simply, our Union Jack flag symbolises everything that isn’t Australian. By Australians using Union Jack and the Southern Cross, it sends the message that we are part of Britain and/or a community of mainly third-world nations. Is that what we want?

Grandpa, how were all the different kinds of dogs bred from wolves?
This was the question our grandson asked of me years ago. I answered his question in the best way I could, by writing and illustrating this book. I would like to share this great story of selectiive breeding with all. So provided that you only take one copy and not reproduce it for commercial purposes, I welcome you print this A5 size book.
And you might like to send a dollar to:
"The fund to clean up Yani's bedroom".
c/o my address.



About the Author
I see real dangers ahead, not only for Australians, but for mankind itself if we don't soon change course. My background is as a Science teaching media producer and Senior Lecturer in the communication of Science and Mathematics teaching media — Ray Smith