« Home | IDT as ethical pursuit » | Deliberative evangelism and recruitment » | My father finds me music » | Brain science furphies » | Petabyte Age negates scientific method? Rubbish » | Personal Democracy Revolutionaries » | A circuit of our politics? » | Where are the giants? » | Australia 2020 Summit full report released » | Deliberative research » 

Teamwork isn't necessarily collaborative

Mark Federman teases apart the concepts of teamwork and collaboration in an organisational context.
True collaboration involves admitting that there are aspects of the situation that you don’t know that you don’t know; that non-obvious others can make a contribution in unanticipated ways; and that you are willing to reveal what otherwise might be considered a lack of competence in a public forum through the act of reaching out. Teamwork, on the other hand, is based on the assumption that information in a bureaucracy is fragmented among its component roles, and that the way to ensure complete information is to identify and bring together the necessary components.
In other words, teamwork puts high responsibility on autonomous individuals for complete and accurate input. Collaboration demands less about independent, competent input but rather a commitment to the emergence of a collective output. Collaboration acknowledges complexity and unpredictability. It also recognises that contributors are fallible humans who draw on all life aspects rather than bureaucratic automatons only concerned with economics and rationality.

The distinction is political.

Via Harold Jarche.

About me

Sponsors

Get your free Elluminate vRoom

Categories

Search

Archives

Links

Legal bits

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons licence.