![]() |
Teenagers Managing Life Crises
|
Using this Book for Teaching Purposes
Film and television writers, and computer and video game designers, often fail to recognise the inherent social responsibility involved in the portrayal of belief systems, and modes of operating, when functioning as secondary socialisers of young people. Film, television, video clips, and computer and video games, present young people with sets of strategies to address conflict, diffuse crises, direct anger, address perceived injustice and deal with ego challenges. If we allow the media to operate in a significant secondary socialiser role, unmediated by responsible guidance, some angry young people will assume socially endorsed options to resolve conflict include the use of lethal weapons, marshal arts, revenge vandalism, vindictive behaviours, and verbal and physical abuse.
As a service provider for at-risk youth, I frequently hear stories of young people's perception of school, parental and legal system injustice. Young people who feel they have been unjustly treated by parents, school staff, police or fellow students, and lack socially endorsed conflict resolution and behaviour self-management skills, may choose to graffiti a building, smash shop windows or take a weapon to school in order to get revenge. These are 'solutions' presented to them in the media through entertainment programs and the news. As a result, a young person who has been rejected in a relationship, but lacks socially endorsed skills and strategies to deal with the rejection, may choose to stalk the target of their affection, hunt out the opposition, or use a weapon to settle the score. In some cases, these choices of action may be reinforced by observing parental behaviours. We cannot count on all children being taught appropriate behaviour strategies at home. Many young people enter the school system lacking behaviour self-management skills and leave school with these deficits unaddressed.
Frequently young people exhibiting anti-social behaviours are removed from the teaching-learning environment, so the compliant others can learn unimpeded. However, where exclusion does not involve skilling-up the offender with behaviour self-management strategies, repeat incidents are inevitable. These young people return to the learning environment with increased learning deficits resulting from the exclusion process, and no new skills to test-drive to minimise the chance of repeat offending. If behaviour issues, and behaviour self-management skill deficits, are addressed during exclusion periods, the teaching-learning environment can improve for all participants.
I believe, as service providers for youth, it is a part of our responsibility to empower these young people with skills to manage their behaviour issues and resolve conflict employing non-violent, socially endorsed 'tools' or strategies. Young people need to be given the opportunity to explore the repercussions of modes of operating and choices of action. They need a chance to develop healthy, socially endorsed strategies to get justice, win affection or get attention.
During the teenage years young people can develop healthy, socially endorsed strategies to cope with life crises and ego challenges under guidance. Adults in nurturing, or secondary socialisation roles, can provide young people with the opportunity to explore issues, develop strategies, skills and tools to manage their futures. Young people need guidance in the selection of appropriate tools and strategies to manage anger, diffuse a conflict or negotiate for better conditions. Many young people enter adult life with a minimally equipped 'toolbox' of strategies to manage life crises. This book was designed to stimulate teenagers to:
In other words, to increase the contents of their lifeskill, anger management and conflict resolution 'toolboxes' in order to facilitate navigating life crises empowered with behaviour self-management skills and effective appropriate, socially endorsed strategies, whilst at the same time, providing them with tools to be effective authors and critical readers of literary texts.
The teenage years are rife with critical incidents. Yet many teenagers:
The work sheet questions in this book are designed to channel class/group discussion of issues. The prime purpose of the work sheets is to stimulate dialogue on youth issues. The intention is to encourage consideration of the repercussions of choices of actions and re-evaluation of one's personal ethical code, whilst facilitating opportunity for peer pressure to operate in positive ways to shape peer choices and actions. I recommend reading each question as a class/group, discussing possible answers and issues, and only then, inviting the young people to write their answers. Answers may then be used to assess literacy or problem solving skills. In this way, the young people:
The literacy skills addressed in this text are:
Scaffolding (in the form of "how to texts" and planning sheets) is provided to facilitate the young people's understanding of the characteristics of various literary genre. This assists both in the creation of their own texts, and the deconstruction of other people's texts.
![]() |
Empowered young people will leave
school with the ability to deconstruct and construct texts in
a variety of genre, and possess the necessary skills to address
the crises and situations they come across in adult life at
home, socially and in the workplace. As secondary, or primary,
socialisers of children it is our responsibility to see that
these skills are acquired, and that the young people leave our
care with a well equipped 'toolbox'. I have employed these stories in classrooms and time-out rooms (exclusion rooms in schools). In time-out rooms teachers can use the texts to help the excluded young person develop problem solving skills and behaviour self-management skills that will empower them with 'tools' they can employ to address the actions that resulted in their exclusion from the classroom. These young people will return to the classroom, having worked on directed texts, with a learning deficit as a result of the exclusion, but with enhanced problem solving skills, strategies and 'tools' to employ to prevent a re-occurrence of the behaviour resulting in their exclusion. |
As primary or secondary socialisers of youth we have a considerable and significant responsibility. For example, as English teachers we can assume our role is merely to teach literacy, or we can take on the hard, but incredibly important task for our society, community and our young people, of empowering them with the 'tools' to critically examine both literary texts, and their values. In this way we take part in shaping powerful citizens, who can serve as future positive role models and good parents. Only through an holistic attitude to education can we generate a better society with socially conscious and empowered citizens.
|
Using this Book for Teaching Purposes |
1 |
|
Introduction |
5 |
|
Be Reflective, not Reactive |
6 |
|
Focal issues: considering what it is to be human; skills to resolve conflicts; thinking about the consequences of choices of action; being reflective not reactive |
6 |
|
Resolving Conflict |
8 |
|
Focal issues: consider the repercussions of choices of action in particular: name calling, starting rumours and challenging people to a fight |
8 |
|
Reading and Writing Fiction |
11 |
|
Tools of the Fiction Writer |
12 |
|
Focal issues: bullying; bullies don’t always win; size isn’t everything; you shouldn’t judge someone’s abilities by just looking at them; and you don’t only win if you land the most punches |
12 |
|
Planning Fiction |
15 |
|
Focal issues: considering the repercussions from starting a rumour or calling someone names |
15 |
|
Spreading Rumours |
18 |
|
Focal issues: dangers of spreading rumours/ assault/ revenge attacks/ escalating violence |
18 |
|
Reading Fiction |
20 |
|
Planning and Writing a Speech |
22 |
|
Jumping to Conclusions |
30 |
|
Focal issues: jumping to conclusions; checking your sources; getting even; dangers of employing violent solutions; considering the repercussions of taking hasty action |
30 |
|
Reading and Writing Non-fiction |
33 |
|
Tools of the Non-fiction Writer |
34 |
|
“The Fox” Hits Back |
41 |
|
Focal issues: picking on the same person all the time; dangers of alienation; getting even; gang violence; considering the long term repercussions of actions; taking up a challenge |
41 |
|
Reading and Writing Newspaper Articles |
44 |
|
Language as a Weapon |
51 |
|
Focal issues: forms of communication – speech, sign and body language; the power of language when employed as a weapon; the disenfranchisement of Indigenous Australians as a result of language used to describe Australia by the European explorers |
51 |
|
Practical Writing Skills |
56 |
|
Bad Boy or Boy Behaving Badly |
57 |
|
Focal issues: consider the influence of a traumatic childhood on a person’s later life; drug using and dealing; crime |
57 |
|
Skipping Class |
63 |
|
Focal issues: truancy; looking at long term repercussions from truancy and failure to succeed at school; revenge violence |
63 |
|
Yossey has AIDS |
67 |
|
Focal issues: AIDS/ making informed decisions/ risks of jumping to conclusions |
67 |
|
The Big “C” |
72 |
|
Focal issues: death and dying; friendship; crises as character building or disempowering |
72 |
|
Preparing a Lifelong Learning Pathway Plan |
76 |
|
Summary |
79 |
Key literacy outcomes: Students will develop an understanding of the ‘toolbox’ of the non-fiction writer and the different tools employed by various genre of non-fiction writing; demonstrate an understanding of how journalists employ these tools to persuade us to their view by looking at a newspaper article; demonstrate an understanding of the difference between journalism and report writing by writing a police report and court depositions from differing perspectives.
Key terms:
persuasive language; expert witness; real case studies; statistics,
data, figures; quotes; acknowledgement of authorship; eye witness
account; police report
The tools of the non-fiction writer include:
Persuasive language this tool is usually employed by journalists and speech writers. Here the authors are trying to put a particular spin on the story so they choose words that lead you to see an event or person in a particular way: as evil, good, cunning, mysterious etc.
Expert witness: non-fiction writers tend to employ experts in the field of study to support their view, or the information they are presenting. These tend to be people who are regarded as having special knowledge of a subject like: a psychiatrist is expected to know about what goes on in our thoughts; a medical doctor or nurse about what goes on in our bodies; an engineer or scientist about things to do with machines or chemicals; a teacher or childcare worker about what is best for children, etc.
Real case studies non-fiction writers tend to use real case studies to support their opinion, or view of a subject. A real case study is usually an example of a person or incident that relates to their story/report. For instance: “Casey, the four year girl, had battled cancer since she was two”; “Jimmy Black, who plays for the Eagles, has had repeated knee injuries”; “Two boys from the housing estate said the man was always weird”; “Dolly, the sheep, who was produced by cloning, has arthritis”.
Statistics, figures and Here non-fiction writers use numerical facts and
research data research data to support their argument. For example: “65% of the people killed in the bomb blast were children”; “25% of year 12 failed the exam”; “as demonstrated by the research data half of the people interviewed prefer drinking coffee in the morning”.
Use of quotes, non-fiction authors use quotes (written or
acknowledgement spoken information from variety of people and or
of authorship texts) to support their views or argument. The people may be researchers, experts in the field, victims or eye witnesses. This information is generally inserted in the main body of the text using quotation marks. For example: Dr Brown, an expert on infectious diseases, said “HIV is spreading in the community because most people would rather believe their partners are safe” (Norton, 1999: 10). In most non-fiction writing authors put the source of the information in brackets. In the above example the book was written by Norton, published in 1999 and the relevant information can be found on page 10. This makes it easy for other people to go and check the source of the information.
Analogy, metaphor, etc Author’s of non-fiction texts also use literary techniques such as figures of speech (analogy, metaphor, symbolism), tense (past, present, future) etc.
Scientific and historical Non-fiction authors rely heavily on what has been
proof written in other texts, and what people have said happened in the past, to support their views. They will quote other people, research, books, papers, magazines, newspaper articles and figures to back up their arguments.
Illustrations, photographs Visual images are included by authors of non-fiction
maps, diagrams, graphs texts to support their position or view.
Very appropriate titles, Journalists tend to use catchy titles such as “Twins
headings and subheadings die in landslide”; or “School a hotbed of trouble”, whilst researchers use titles such as “The Long Term Repercussions of Marijuana Use: a longitudinal study” or “ACDC: a history of their music”.
Examples Examples are employed by all non-fiction writers to support their arguments. These may be: “six of their ten records made it to number one”; “most children reported they would like to quit smoking as it is so expensive”; “there have already been ten violent incidents at this school in the past month”.
These tools are easy to remember by using the mnemonic (memory trigger) “PERSUASIVE”, employing the first letter of each “tool”. Non-fiction is enriched and made more powerful and believable by the use of these tools.
We’ll begin by looking at Conrad Hocking’s newspaper article on the next page based on the incident in “Jumping to Conclusions” (page 30).
The Milford News
13 April 2004
Smash up after School
By Conrad Hocking
|
Yesterday after school there was a nasty punch up between two girls. This is the third fight outside the school gates this week. Rumour has it that there was jealousy involved: it was a lovers’ tiff. A girl from another school was punched in the face. This looks pretty bad for our school. It looks like we can’t solve problems without violence. |
The school nurse, Sister Mary Prince, said, “the young girl’s nose was broken and she will have a black eye by morning”. The school principal, Mrs Summers, stated that she was very disappointed in the Milford students involved in the incident. She intends to treat the incident as a serious breach of rules. I have organized a meeting after school |
today to talk about what we, as students at Milford Grammar, can do about it. The meeting will be in the auditorium at 3.30pm. We’d like as many students as possible to attend. Together we can do something about this. Our school’s reputation is at stake! |
1.
Newspaper articles are generally viewed as non-fiction (that
is telling about real events and people), but newspaper articles tend
to put a particular spin on events, that is, they use the
events to make a point. What point do you think the journalist
(a writer of newspaper articles; magazines; ezines; television
programs; documentaries; non-fiction films or television programs) is
trying to make here?
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
2. Is the journalist a teacher or student at the school? __________________________
3.
Do you think this influenced the way in which the story was told?
Why?
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
4. Go through the article carefully. Identify all the tools that Hocking used to try and persuade us to come to his meeting after school? For example:
Persuasive
language:
“nasty”; “punch up”;_______________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Expert witnesses:
______________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
5.
What other tools could Hocking have employed to make his article more
powerful? (look at the Tools of the Non-fiction Writer
on pages 34-36).
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
To write up this incident as a police report you would have to report what happened (the facts/non-fiction) and eliminate persuasive language and other tools employed by journalists to persuade you to their view. For instance you might say, “At 3pm on Friday 13th April 2004 Sandy Morrison hit Jane Fletcher in the face outside the grounds of Milford Grammar School”. You could still give information you heard on how the fight began, and why it happened, but it would have to be presented as an eye witness account (using the words or information gathered from someone who saw or heard about the incident) eg “Miles said that Sandy was angry because…”. You can also still quote from expert witnesses (such as teachers, nurses, principals, doctors).
6. Write up the incident as if you are making a police report. Remember: police want the facts – who, what, when, where and why (the five “w”s).
Top | Teenagers learning about life | About the Author | Education research publications |