Third Sunday of Lent 2006
Return to Homilies Index
1. The Ten Commandments
- The
most important thing about the Ten Commandments in both Exodus and
Deuteronomy is their context, as in “I am the Lord your God, who brought
you out of the land of Egypt,
out of the house of slavery.”
- These
are some of the elements of a covenant with this Compassionate,
Liberating God, at the same time some basic
requirements or ground-rules for continuing to live as a liberated people
of such a God in peace and freedom.
- As St
Paul in particular makes clear, however,
following on from his master Jesus and the great O.T. prophets and
fifteen hundred years of relative disaster: it is not enough for the
Liberating God to be just a memory, with everything then just handed over
to us. Law and commandments make
sense only in the context of the continuing Presence and Power in us and
among us of the Compassionate Liberating God, working day by day in our
lives, luring us on, making us more and more the children, the sons and
daughters, and mopping up the mess and putting us back together when we
fail. In other words, the
continuing presence of Christ among us and of the Spirit which makes us
the children of God.
- Nor
is this the whole covenant, the whole of what it is to be one of the sons
and daughters, brothers and sisters of Jesus operating out of the power
of his Spirit. These are more like
the rules of the game, the rules of the game within which our lives as
children of God take place, growth in virtue, growth in discipleship and
growth as community, into the special persons and special people God calls
and lures us into being.
Presumably, the Broncos obeyed the rules of the game of Rugby
League last weekend just as well as the Cowboys, even though the Cowboys
romped all over them.
- Nevertheless,
even those ancient Ten Commandments would seem to be of continuing and
crucial importance for us and for our world, especially the first three
or four.
- The
next thing to notice, though only a small detail, is that for us Catholics
the numbering system is all wrong.
If we number like we usually do, fifth commandment thou shalt not kill, sixth commandment, thou shalt not commit adultery, we end up with only
nine. This is because we Catholics
run with the version in Deuteronomy rather than Exodus, which combines the
first two into one, and splits the last one into two. Or vice versa if you are a Protestant
and prefer to run with the earlier text from Exodus. But nothing hinges on it,
they are all there either way.
Though it could be a little confusing in Confession I suppose, if
people on each side were operating with different numbering systems!
- In
the old days we were told, the first three (or four) were duties towards
God, the last seven (or six) duties to our fellow humans. While there is an obvious point to this,
I’m not sure whether it might in fact be more misleading than helpful:
- All
ten are Divine commandments, all ten are part of our Covenant with the
compassionate, liberating God who set us free and sets us up as a new
People. In this sense, they are all
duties towards God, part of our religion, God-chosen duties towards God. Whether we like it our not, for
Christian and Jew love of neighbour is included
in our love of God, any attempt to separate them gets us into serious
trouble: a person who says, I love God, and does not love the brethren is
a liar. If you love me you will
keep my commandments, and the commandment I give you is to love one
another. Whatever you do to one of
these the least of my brethren you do to me. Etc. etc.
- On
the other hand, it is probably the first three or four commandments which
are the most important for love of neighbour:
- The
first one or two have to do with the prohibition of idols, not having
false gods. But what is an idol? (Nothing
to do with Australian Idol, which seems to be pretty harmless.) An idol is something to which we bow
and scrape, which we bow down and serve to the
point of sacrificing our fellow human beings and sometimes even
ourselves. Indeed, this latter
aspect is part of the prophetic definition of an idol, how you know you
have one, how you know that your attitude has gone past proper valuation
in the direction of a demi-god to which we bow
and which we serve: an idol = what demands human sacrifice. Jesus talked
about not being able to serve both God and Mammon, and John Paul II
spoke often of the idols of money and power, to which we sacrifice whole
sectors of our community. But
almost anything can get to the point of being an idol in this sense, not
just religions and ideologies: the nation state, national security, the
war against terror, our own fears, even ‘our right to determine who
comes to our country’ or ‘freedom and democracy’, or ‘the right to free
speech’, as well as particular forms of religion – whatever we use to
turn off our normal respect for the dignity of other human beings and
indeed sometimes our own dignity, whatever we constitute as an altar for
human sacrifice.
- The
second or third commandment has to do with the misuse of the name of
God. This is not just blasphemy,
though: it’s terrorism nowadays, it’s religious wars, God on our side, it’s
crusades, it’s inquisition, bringing God into our petty disputes and
religion into disrepute; on a more banal level, it’s making money out of
pilgrims, it’s using religion for political and economic reasons
generally, it’s turning the temple of God into a marketplace and a den
of thieves.
- The
third commandment, for its part, if you read the whole lot, is probably
the first example of social justice legislation in world history: not
just me, everyone gets a day off.
Indeed you could take this as an early affirmation of the dignity
of each and every human being irrespective of age or gender or class or
legal status, and even a bit of affirmation of animals, even the animals
are to get the day off.
- (Even
the fourth or fifth commandment, when considered like the others as
directed at adults, is in the way of a recommendation for cross-generational
respect: it is directed primarily to adults, like the others, and what
it really has to do with is not so much young children obeying their
parents as adults giving respect and honour to
their parents in their old age.
- For
all their importance for human life, in comparison particularly to the
first two or three commandments, considered this way the other six or
seven rate as mere detail – even nowadays, perhaps even especially
nowadays. Albeit important detail, and of course there is lots of
ordinary everyday murder and adultery and stealing and lying which may
have little or nothing to do with the big forces which determine our
global fate and with which the first three commandments would seem to have
to do.
Return
to Homilies Index
2. The Cleansing of
the Temple
- It
is in the light of the idolatry of money and power and the misuse of God’s
name, and the effect that problems with the God stuff can have on our
fellow human beings, that we can understand something of Jesus’ anger. Jesus’ anger when he went into the Temple,
this religiously sensitive person who treasures the Temple
as his Father’s House, and running on the Infancy Narratives always has
since he was twelve, devoured by zeal for God’s house. But a person also devoured by zeal for
the Lost Sheep the poor the sick the blind the lame, the little ones. His
Father’s House should be a house of prayer, not a marketplace or a den of
thieves; and a house of prayer for all the people, not just the religious
elite and the reasonably well off.
- Our
version from John’s Gospel has ‘market’ or marketplace. Matthew Mark
and Luke have, ‘den of thieves’. It
certainly was a marketplace, sheep and cattle and birds and money-changers
and people everywhere buying and selling, it would have been a noisy
place. Indeed it was an important
part of the Jerusalem economy
and a key source of economic as well as political power. Not exactly the kind of place to appeal
to Jesus’ religious sensitivities.
It probably was also something of a den of thieves. Given the way things were set up, this
was almost inevitable. There were
two points to take a cut, to make a profit. Roman coinage was not
accepted, so it had to be exchanged. And then you had to go and buy with
the exchanged money your sheep or cow or bird to be sacrificed. And all this in a captive market, people
intent on doing their best by their religion, the best sacrifice they could
afford. And doubtless the temple
authorities who controlled the franchise would take their cut.
- But
it was not just that you needed to be financial to be a part of it
all. The disabled as such are
prejudiced against in the priests’ manual, the Book of Leviticus, for
example, Leviticus 21:16-23, “…For no one who has a blemish shall draw
near, one who is blind or lame, or one who has a mutilated face or a limb
too long, or one who has a broken foot or a broken hand, or a hunchback,
or a dwarf, or a man with a blemish in his eyes or an itching disease or
scabs…he shall not come near the curtain or approach the altar, because he
has a blemish, that he may not profane my sanctuaries…”. Hardly the Commonwealth Games with its
integration of disabled athletes.
- According
to Matthew’s version, after the cleansing of the Temple,
“The blind and the lame came to Jesus in the Temple,
and he cured them.” This seems to
have annoyed the chief priests and scribes almost as much as the cleansing
itself. Entertaining the blind and
the lame in the Temple and
mediating to them God’s healing and compassion, something so blatent, must have been particularly annoying. And in the light of such texts from
Leviticus as the above, it may constitute as important a sign as the cleansing
itself.
- And
so the Incoming of the Reign of God, the Kingdom of Heaven, with its key
values, gets to clash with earthly realities, the idolatry of money and
power, the misuse of God’s name and the virtual exclusion of the poor and
oppressed, in the Temple which should be a House of Prayer for All the People
but is more like a marketplace and a den of thieves. As one of the commentaries said, this
kind of thing you only get to do once.
Up to this point Jesus was more of a nuisance, now he is on the way
to his death, only a matter of time, a death which will be a scandal to
the Jews, madness to the Greeks, but to those who are called the Power and
Wisdom of God.
Return to Homilies Index
3. The Dispersal of
the Divine Presence
- Jesus
treasured the Temple, ‘My Father’s House’, and the whole point of the
Cleansing of the Temple is to restore it as a House of Prayer for All the
People including not only the poor but the blind and the crippled and the
other miscellaneous excluded. This
seems to be part of his sense of mission of what he came to do. This is in
spite of the fact that he and his group of disciples have been functioning
as an alternative centre of the divine presence, running around Galilee
and in places in between, the bodily presence of Jesus itself as, in
today’s words, a temple, a kind of alternative sanctuary.
- This
dual pattern continued among Jewish Christians in Jerusalem
after the death, resurrection and ascension of Jesus, gathering together
in the Temple on almost a
daily basis and breaking bread together in their homes, experiencing and
recognizing the presence of the risen Jesus in the Breaking of the
Bread. This pattern seems to have
continued probably right up to the time of the destruction of the Temple
in 70 A.D., and we find even St Paul
involved in Temple worship
during his last trip to Jerusalem.
- After
the destruction of Jerusalem,
however, even the keenest Jewish Christians found that they, Christian
Jews, didn’t need the Temple,
unlike their Jewish brethren. God’s
Temple now, God’s sacred space
is now wherever the risen Christ is present, and the risen Christ is
present wherever two or three gather in prayer and especially when they
gather for the breaking of the bread.
God’s House, My Father’s House, is, wherever the children gather.
- This
is something I’ve experienced since coming to the parishes of Herberton, Malanda and Yungaburra, each with their historic churches. What makes them sacred spaces, and I
think they are all obvious sacred spaces, what makes them sacred spaces is
not some blessing ceremony a hundred years ago, but the gathering of God’s
children in the spaces since, and the gathering which still continues, the
important part these spaces have played in people’s lives, and the love
and care that has been put into them over the years. My Father’s House, Wherever the Children
Gather.
Return to Homilies Index