Secrets of the Bible

• Introduction
• Genesis
• The Creation of Man
• The Paradise
• The Snake - Symbol of Evil
• The Wood of Life
• The Children of the First Created
• The 10 Tribal Leaders & the 6 Days of Creation
• The Tower of Babel
• Abraham
• The Sacrifice of Isaac
• Jacob and Esau
• Exodus
• The Laws
• Joshua
• The Deuteronomy
• The Prophecies of Daniel
• The Revelation
• The Gospels

EXODUS

      An Exodus presupposes an entrance, as an entrance into a house, life, passion that leads to slavery, and an exodus from slavery that presupposes faith to God, it also presupposes strong will to struggle. The entrance into slavery started by an evil commercial act, the selling of Joseph, and the entrance into sin that enslaves the soul, starts with similar acts and choices. Every day we sell and betray our brothers for our own interests, passions, and so we are all look like the hard brothers of Joseph. By doing so we enchain ourselves. But again, the exodus is not an easy task, it presupposes our strong will and endeavour that often is a struggle for the rest of our lives. We certainly need God's help to do it; help that presupposes to ask for, for the reason that the act of asking for help; is the main part of our will to struggle.

     The 40 years of wandering in the desert symbolizes also a generation or a middle average of life, in which we wander and prepare ourselves to enter the Promise Land. The desert precedes the Promise Land, and so, we all live in the desert. The true Promised Land is not of course a piece of land, a grave of two meters for which often brothers kill each other to share it. The true Promised Land is the spiritual Creation of God. On the earth, the desert is the one that exists and prevails, and of course it doesn't represent the Creator. In this desert, in the one of devil's domination, exist a lot problems, a lot of injustice, diseases, pain and sufferings for all the people, and when someone has faith, must fight back every day in order to beat his nature, which also means, to be liberated from the domination of the devil.

     The manna symbolizes a logical frugality. A belly slave loses easily the power to struggle, while the excessive eating and too many necessities, are also a kind of enslaving. But of course, it is not only the allegorical meaning that comes out from this book. Beside the laws, there is also the literal story, and the traditional perceptions of the writers as well. So I will try to see the book in general. Is there perhaps someone who believes to the Creator of the universe, and doubts that the Almighty Creator would have the power to keep a nation 40 years in the desert? Certainly there is no one. Let see then the various parts of the book. I don't have to repeat again, that all these writings are not belonging to Moses. Besides they didn't hide it. If all were Moses' writings, then at least it would have been his personal narration quoting what he did or said. Moses wouldn't write what Moses did, or what God told him and what he answered. At least the writers are honest and inform the reader that the last author, or rather the finisher was somebody else, or some others, not Moses himself. Certainly they had some Moses' writing and as usual they added their own, and with other traditional perceptions they "completed" the book.

      But is required a quick parenthesis. A lot of people believe that this book, and all the others as well, were entirely confirmed by the Holy Spirit, for the reason that the Apostles had talk about some parts of the books. Of course they were not occupied with those ugly writings of the Old Testament, but from some of their scattered phrases, we may think that indeed they (maybe) believed that all the writings were direct revelations of God, and all expressed His Will. I say maybe, which means not sure at all. Especially we notice it at the epistles of Paul, who seemed that he confirmed the depreciation of the woman as God's Will. He also mentioned at some other writings. But as we saw at the interpretation of the book of Genesis, the depreciation of the woman, which was the result of the historic and social circumstances, served social necessities in barbarian conditions, by helping not to split so easy the families. So Apostle Paul, and of course the others as well, is a part of the Bible, and he had to adapt himself at the general spirit of the Bible. He served either in his knowledge, or in his ignorance the Will of God, for the reason that he served social necessities.   

      We also read some other words as for example, Luke wrote in the Gospel the genealogy of the nation as it was registered by the state officials, which started from the symbolic first created of the holy Prophet Moses. So a lot of people believe that all the writings were confirmed from the Holy Spirit, something, which is absolute wrong. And let us ask a question. The Apostles used also to believe that at their time, the end of the world would come. Did perhaps the Holy Spirit reveal to them some thing like this? And of course it is not only this. Well, yes, the Holy Spirit inspired them in some areas, and reminded them about the teaching of the Lord, but not in everything they wrote. God let them also write as eyewitnesses, as historians and as humans of their time, who had been taught that all writings of the Old Testament had been written according the Will of God. That was the one and real side of the truth, and that was what they knew. The other side is that many writers of the Bible who were not Prophets wrote a lot of parts, or rather the most parts of the Bible in the name of the Lord; they put their additions on top and between the writings of the Prophets, and presented everything as the Will of God. But of course, their writings were not according the Will of God. Actually in many areas they wrote clear foolishness that reflect their ignorance and confusion. For example, they wrote that God was walking ahead to find for them suitable places to camp, and according to them, Moses told them to carry a little shovel to cover their excrements because God they said was walking in the camp. We will see all these in the following subjects.    

     Well, even if the Apostles new everything, which of course they didn't, it was not the time for critique and elucidation of the writings. If it were, then the Lord Himself would do it; the Lord would elucidate the meanings of the prophecies and symbols. When they asked the Lord, when will happen all these, the Lord said, it is not for you to know these things. So it was not the time to elucidate the writings, and therefore Lord and the Holy Spirit wouldn't tell them that the writing of Moses speak symbolical, or which writings were inspired by God, and which are not. Briefly, the Apostles were natural witnesses in what they heard and saw, and also were inspired when had to write other messages of God. They were also people of their time, and had opinions that were belonging to their time.

      They had absolute faith and trust to God, and while they couldn't reject or criticize all those criminal activities that appeared as Word of God, certainly were trying not to think about them at all, for the reason that Lord didn't say anything about these, while His teaching was not matching with them. There was an opposition with a lot of silent questions, a silent mystery, because it was not the time, and God didn't allow the elucidation of the symbols, and the critique on all those crimes, which happened on His name. The truth will shine at the correct time. And again, if the Apostles understood all the symbols of the book of Genesis, and of the other prophecies and interpreted them, then simply, there wouldn't be any reason to be written. There wouldn't be any reason also to be written the book of Revelation as well. Everything would be written literally and direct, but as we realize, the opposite has happened.     

     So let see the book of Exodus. According the writings, after the death of Joseph, the people of Israel continued to live peacefully in their new country. They increased a lot, and enjoyed the same rights as the Egyptians, until a new king took over, who no longer recognized Joseph. Clearly they meant, that the new king didn't recognize the rights of the Hebrews, and according the writings it happened about 300 years later. It is written, that the new king was afraid that the Hebrews might be united with the enemies of Egypt, and fight against them. So he converted them into slaves, and placed superintendents to depress them.

     He also did something very evil. Because he was afraid that the Hebrews could increase more in population, and would be threat for his country, gave orders to kill all the male children and let alive only the girls. Now the question is, what was the reason that made the king to be so harsh, and what enemies he was afraid for? The Egyptian sources mention about some pastoral people who used to call them Yksos. The name means royal shepherds or shepherds of the king. It is unknown why they had this name, but according the Egyptian sources, it was not that people who went away from Egypt with Moses, for whom they used to call him Osarshif. The Egyptian didn't identify the Yksos with the Hebrews slaves who been liberated by Moses and with the power of God.

      At the end, the Yksos were defeated and enforced to go away from Egypt. So the king was afraid that the Hebrews would be united with the Yksos to fight against them, and it seems that indeed some Hebrews had been already united with the Yksos, and fought against Egypt. So they gave occurrence to the king to abolish all of their rights converting them into slaves. Of course he needed slaves, but also was afraid of them, for the reason that he new very well that by converting them into slaves, they had serious reasons to hate him. So he set the bosses to depress them, and to avoid further problems by their increasing, gave orders to kill the male children. Moses survived from that slaughter with the known way. That is why king's sister called him Moses. The name means someone who emerged from water. The Baptized. So Moses grew up as Egyptian in the palace. According the Egyptian sources, his name was Osarshif, and was a priest of Osiris. But it seems correct that this name was rather a title of the priest, or maybe it was another name that was given to him by the Egyptians. Probably, someone who emerged from the water didn't sound as a real name. It seems also that Moses under inspiration kept this name as a symbolic one. However, his name was Moses, and the slaves who being delivered into freedom were not the same people who invaded Egypt and called them Yksos. But as he grew up as an Egyptian and as a prince, it is rather correct that he was indeed for some time priest of Osiris.                  

      It seems also that his mother or his brother met him at some time, and told him the secret and then he left behind everything and went to Midian. Of course it is written that he killed an Egyptian, and that is why he left. But this is a rather a made up story, or it was mentioned for somebody else. According to the written word, he saw two Hebrew slaves fighting, and he said to the one, why do you strike your brother. And the other told him, who are you to tell me what to do. Do you want to kill me as you killed the Egyptian? According to them, a Hebrew slave spoke like this to the Egyptian prince, (who are you), which doesn't sound correct at all. Even if Moses killed someone, he could justify the crime by various ways, and could even punish the slave who spoke to him like this. But even a Hebrew slave wouldn't have the courage to speak like this to a prince. He would be afraid for his life. But what it is rather correct, the king was informed that Moses was a son of Hebrews, and his sister deceived him. That is why Moses went away to Midian. There he married Zipporah who was one of the daughters of Jethro. I have no reasons to doubt about this, and besides it wouldn't make any difference. For other things we have serious reasons to doubt, for the reason that many of these writings that are mentioned to God, not matching at all with God, neither do with the great Prophet.     

     So according to the writings of chapter 3, Moses was pasturing the sheep of his father in law at the back place of the desert, and came or rather he went up the mountain Horeb, which as they wrote it was "the mountain of God." I repeat again, and besides as it is obvious, many of the writings reflect the ignorance and the perceptions of the writers. It is not Moses who speaks here; there are some others, and again the last of them were some others, and rather only the first of them were based on Moses' writings. So an Angel appeared on the mountain Horeb, as flame of fire in a blackberry bush, and while the fire was in the bush, the bush was not consumed. Moses said with himself, let turn and see this marvellous thing, and when he turned, heard the voice of God. (From inside the bush?). They also wrote that the first thing that God asked Moses was to take out his sandals. Now the question is, why he should take out his shoes? Is there perhaps any logic, to make us understand, why Moses shouldn't wear shoes on that mountain? Yes there was logic, and the logic or rather the perception was in the confused brains of the writers. That mountain or some other one which they perplexed it with the mountain Horeb was some thing like the mountain Olympus, on which according the public faith, used to live some gods. At the chapter 19, 12, 13, is written that God told to Moses, you say to the people to stay around the mountain and don't touch it, otherwise they are going to be killed by stones and arrows. According to them, God would kill the people with stones and arrows! So we understand how much confused they were.             

     Those who were fighting with stones and arrows were of course the tribal leaders before they die and deified. So we see very clearly traditional perception that been attached in the book of Exodus. The traditions declared, that mountain or some other one, for which they perplexed with the mountain Horeb, was the mountain of the gods, and as it is known, those gods as long lived as tribal leaders, used to walk barefooted, because simply, they didn't have shoes to wear. So this traditional perception remained that enforced anyone who would go close to a mountain like this to take off his shoes. The gods "used to live" up to the mountain, and before die were going around barefooted, so everyone should imitate them and pay respect. This is the only way to interpret this paradox. Certainly God didn't tell him to take out his shoes. Why God would ask something like this? If what the human makes for his life were unholy and contagious for God, then God would ask him to take out his cloths as well. If only the shoes were unholy because walked on various places, then and the barefooted feet would be also unholy. Because his shoes were already up on the mountain, and so it wouldn't make any difference, if wear them or not.

     But those people were confused with their traditional gods. When Lord was walking on the earth was of course dressed and was wearing sandals; He never said it was sin or lack of respect for the people to wear their basic cloths and shoes. The respect of the human to God distinguishes in his love and faith, distinguishes in his glance, his heart, his acts and words, and never in his poor cloths and shoes. So we see very clearly traditional perceptions that appear as the Word of God, and even at our times we see people to take out their shoes in the temples. The other paradox is the "objections" of Moses and his "refusal" to obey to God. God said to Moses, and Moses said to God! It is very surprising to hear that the Creator of the universe had a conversation with a human being, and the human, the earthly creature, heard God's voice with his ears, was answering to God, and yes, was refusing to obey! According to them, Moses "disagreed" with the suggestions of God, he "didn't agree" with God, he demanded explanations, he disputed the correctness of God's decisions, and therefore he was blaspheming His Wisdom. It sounds like he was saying to God; did You think correctly what is going to happen if I do what You ask me? And according to them, God was listening his objections and was trying to make him obedient. God they said was very angry because Moses refused to obey. So according to them Moses was disobedient and audacious. Not of course. The Prophet was not disobedient and audacious; the writers were those who didn't know what they were writing. 

     Certainly this conversation was not between God and Moses, but it reflects a conversation between an old chief with another almost equal. Those gods, as long were alive, used to have similar eccentricities, and would disagree each other and argue, and say yes and no, and so they presented Moses in the same way, by disagreeing and arguing with God, and saying no, and demanding explanations like they were equal and could sometimes give advise even to God.

     But over across these paradoxes, the Revelation of the Highest to Moses was a great fact. This voice of the Lord by the first heard words, I Am, and this miscomprehension for that time I Am, and even only this, is enough to prove the truly of the ancient holy inspired Bible. As much they winded up with a lot of traditional perceptions, and as much didn't understand the meaning of I Am, it shines as the sun, and the divine Light blinds the foolish and arrogant, and makes the wise and pious to shine and rejoice. Lord mentioned and concealed this great Revelation saying, God spoke to Moses as God of the living people, and not as God of the dead. We glorify the Highest God. The Almighty Lord said; I Am that I Am. I Am the God of Abraham, of Isaac and Jacob. Some people give various meanings on this "name" of God. But it is not a name at all. God, the Supreme Mind has no name.

     The names belong and match to the limited creatures, and never to the Highest Creator. Lord revealed Himself by the words, I Am that I Am, I Am the God of the live pious and just people, and He is not belonging to the time and space. The Lord is not belonging to the past or the future, is always I Am.  The ancient writers, who lived in conditions of ignorance, couldn't comprehend what God meant by the word I Am, but unfortunately, not even many modern people didn't want to comprehend this great meaning, they didn't want to understand that at least at that time it was impossible to be human's invention. They didn't try with their wise yards to comprehend the messages of the prophecies, to combine them all together and solve the divine puzzle, and have the proofs of God.  

     I consider also that the burning bush symbolizes the human soul. No, I don't think it was an Angel who appeared in the burning blackberry bush; rather it was a symbolic bush, not literal one. The blackberry bush the so much thorny, and also perplexed and inaccessible which blossoms and makes so delicious berries, somewhere is related with the human soul. The soul is also about the same way confused, perplexed in the kingdom of the devil, though the Spirit of the Highest vivifying it, inflaming without burning it, so it may blossom and produce those holy spiritual fruit that direct the soul in the Arms of the Highest Father. So, I consider, the burning and not burning bush in some way was reflecting the soul of Moses. When Moses saw this image and heard the holy voice, then he understood, he felt, that the bush was his soul, in which recognized the Appearance and the voice of the Highest. Then he understood who was the One who spoke to him, because while was just and pious, often felt within him the same Holy Voice to speak.           

     It is also written another paradox. They wrote that when Moses left the mountain Horeb, he went to his father in law, and told him he had decided to return to Egypt to find out if his brothers were still alive. After they wrote that God told him to return to Egypt, because those who wanted to kill him were already dead. The very paradox is this one. While Moses was going his way to Egypt, he stopped somewhere to have a rest, and God met him in purpose to kill him, because he didn't circumcise his son. So God sent him to liberate the slaves, and according to them, God also met him to kill him for the reason that he didn't circumcise his son! Well, he was lucky enough, because Zipporah took a sharp stone and circumcised her son, and threw it in front of his feet. Whose feet? It is not known whose feet they meant. And then Zipporah said. (You are indeed a bridegroom of blood to me. You are a bridegroom of blood because of the circumcision.) Exodus, 4 -- 25. 

     And then went away. Who went away? Rather they meant God went away from Moses. And Zipporah repeated saying, you are bridegroom of blood because of the circumcision. Now what is the meaning of all these illogicality? Did perhaps God change His decisions, or God appeared as a ghost pretending as if He wanted to kill Moses? Where is the logic in these writings? If the circumcision were by God's order, then Lord wouldn't tell Moses during the burning bush and though as they said God had a conversation with Moses? Why didn't God say to Moses; you go first and circumcise your son. So God would confirm, that the circumcision is His Will. Was it possible to appear after like a phantom to kill Moses after already giving him instructions, which Moses had to serve? So we see again that (you are bridegroom of blood for me (God) by the circumcision) reflect that primitive perception about bridegrooms of blood, and the relation of blood, they used to have with the gods. The gods were everywhere present in their life and used to emphasize their racial prestige. The gods continually were for them relatives of blood, they were the distant deified ascenders, and couldn't forget them. Who knows what did the holy inspired Prophet write relative, or what did he write about the Bridegroom who would come to the world, and what exactly he wrote about the relation of His Blood with the enslaved human!

      Under those circumstances it was very difficult for them to be liberated from the traditional perceptions, and as a result of this, they used to have similar perceptions about God. Idle talk continues with the further "disputes between God and Moses" on which they loaded a thousand of sins, and according to them it was "difficult" for God to finally convince Moses to conform. Elsewhere again they wrote that God made hard the heart of Pharaoh, and made him to be disobedient, because as they wrote, God wanted to show His power to the world. The creation itself reveals how powerful is the Creator, but in their ignorance they tell us that God "was acting fraudulently" to show His power. We read with astonishment and indignation that God was doing such things and everything. According to them, God used to bring the wounds, and also God used to make Pharaoh's heart hard, to be disobedient. According to them, God "was doing" everything bad, every evil, and everything holy and unholy. And then what did Pharaoh do? How he was guilty? While, and according to them, he was doing whatever God enforced him to do! What did those people write!   

     There is many more illogicality that is better to ignore. Let us see the miracles and the messages of God. The first miracle was with the snakes. But this miracle seems also to be falsified. We also see that the conversion of the stick into a snake happened at the second visiting to Pharaoh. It is written that at the first visiting Moses and Aaron said to Pharaoh, that God asked him to let the slaves go to the desert, to offer sacrifices to God. That means, they didn't say at the first time, that God asked Pharaoh to liberate the slaves, but according to them, not only Moses but also even God tried to deceive Pharaoh. If they at least said that from the first visit, God asked Pharaoh through His Prophet to liberate the slaves, they would be in borders that match with God. How could something like this be possible? God would "try and yes in vain to deceive Pharaoh"? Was it possible for the Almighty and Omniscient Creator to act in this unholy way? Not of course. They also said, that this miracle with the snakes occurred in purpose to impress Pharaoh. So according to them, God wanted to impress Pharaoh!    

      But let us see how we understand this miracle and what Moses wrote about. It seems rather clear, that at the first visiting Moses and Aaron said to Pharaoh, that it was God's demand to liberate the slaves, but Pharaoh refused. And not only refused, but because he wanted to prove that he was also god and the ruler of his country, he gave orders to depress more the slaves. In another words he was provoking God, and yes said that he was a god, as usual. So he gave orders to depress the slaves, and the result was to turn them against God and against His Prophet. The snake was in his kingdom, and as usual was trying to cause confusion and turn even the descendents of Abraham against God. At the second visit Moses warned Pharaoh saying, that a curse would come in his country with terrible wounds if he didn't obey God. Of course God knew what would happen, and knew how far the catastrophic mania of the devil would take over Pharaoh.

      It seems that Moses told him the sovereignty in Egypt was the one of a snake. It was the sovereignty of the devil. And to prove it, he rather asked him to throw his royal sceptre on the ground. And as Pharaoh was curious, he threw his sceptre, and he saw that it was converted into a snake. But of course he didn't obey, for the reason that his priests told him that it was a common fakir trick, and also the spirit of the diabolical sceptre (the sovereignty of the snake) was of its nature catastrophic. The devil from his nature to destroy influenced Pharaoh to be disobedient, because by been disobedient he would cause destructions, and that is exactly what satisfies the devil. That is how we can interpret this conversion, not the stick of Moses, but rather the sceptre of Pharaoh was the one that was converted into a snake. The sceptre was the symbol of the symbolic snake, and rather it looked like a snake also. So he who made hard the heart of Pharaoh was certainly that symbolic snake, which always is evil, and always wants to destroy people.

      Moses was going to Pharaoh holding his stick, and every time he didn't obey, Moses was lifting up his stick against the sovereignty of the snake and of Pharaoh, and every time caused some curse against Egypt. So we understand that the wounds that stroke Egypt didn't come from God, but the provoking and arrogant behaviour of Pharaoh in front of the Creator, and his refusal to obey, caused the curse, and therefore the curse, meaning the total aversion of God in front of the provoking and arrogant refusal Pharaoh, had untied the hands of the devil, and he had absolute freedom to act and satisfy himself. Certainly he wouldn't lose so great an opportunity. It was a great opportunity for him, in which by the aversion of God, the balance was mostly lost, and it was turning towards the devil. So he could destroy, and whom he destroys doesn't make any difference, it is enough for him to destroy, and besides he destroys everybody who obeys him.  

      As we understand better our beloved Creator, and as we understand by interpreting the book of Revelation, every evil that exists in the creation originated from the devil and from his interpositions. And from these things Egypt was wounded. The evil is his creation, and the great dragon is the one that moves every evil, for the reason that it is belonging to him, and he claims it. God never punish unjustly anyone, never pretends, and never hardens the heart of anyone. When the Lord takes lives, the lives are not destroyed, because Lord is the Master of life, and always He has the first and the last word on the soul of every human, and that applies of course and for the innocent victims of Egypt. Well, as it is obvious many innocent people had been suffered and killed, while were not responsible for the devil's and Pharaoh's actions.         

      Now of course someone would ask, why all these things happened, and why God asked Pharaoh to liberate the slaves? For it would be very easy for God to gather the slaves all together at one place and drive them to the freedom, ignoring what Pharaoh wanted or not. What Pharaoh could do, and again, why the Almighty Creator asked or ordered him to liberate the slaves, while Lord had of course all the power to liberate them? Well, this is a complicated secret that only partly could be understood. If the slaves were really holy people, if they had real faith to God, and if indeed were seeking God with deeds and word, which means if they were really worthy, then God would liberate them without any problem. But as we read, the slaves were obstinate, and not only in Egypt, but even in the desert. After all those miracles, the only thing they wanted was to have good life and didn't care much in what God wanted. So to be liberated, the scale of justice should turn towards them. They were unfaithful and enough corrupted as well, and therefore the devil laid claim to them, and could say they were belonging to him, because their behaviour was bad and evil, and these things are belonged to the devil. 

     The devil accuses the people for the reason that they do the wrong, they acting evilly, and by acting evilly are choosing the devil, and so are belonging to him. But the Blood of the Lamb atones people and makes them worthy to God. The Christian Passover, meaning the passing from the enslaving of the devil in the atonement and liberation, which makes people worthy to God, occurred through the Crucifixion and Resurrection of the Lord. We can have atonement through the Blood of the Lamb. But how could the obstinated slaves have atonement? The devil said they belonged to him. But by making Pharaoh to refuse, he caused a lot of ruins and sufferings to innocent people, something that was satisfying him, and also unknowingly contributed for the slaves to wake up, and seek God and become obedient to His Prophet. So the justice turned towards them, and then God liberated them. The same is true with the story of the angel of death. This satisfaction of the devil contributed also for the liberation of the slaves. But God is the absolute Master of the innocent souls, and of all the unjust murdered. When Lord was born, the reptile killed again innocent children, as he wanted to satisfy himself and take revenge, because Lord came in to the foreign world to liberate people from the devil. (He came to His own, but His own didn't receive Him.) Because the majority of the people, were submitted to the sovereignty of the devil.

      Unfortunately, the devil has rights in the world in which he rules, and for the people to be belonging to God, the just must turn towards their salvation. It is very difficult to comprehend the absolute Just and Holy Creator; there are a lot of secrets, which some time will be revealed. The blood as a cross on the doors was exactly the symbol of the Crucified Saviour. Moses told them that they should fasting for 14 days, two weeks, and the 14^th day to kill the lamb or the goat kid, and set on the doors the symbol of the cross. Not of course for the angel of death to see the blood and overpass that door, because the angel wouldn't know. No. But the angel of death had no right in the house on which was the symbol of the cross. It was the symbol of the victory for the liberation of the slaves.          

      The Passover was the passing to liberation from the bounds of slavery, and should celebrate every year, so this event may remain in their memory. It was to remember their liberation from the bonds of slavery, until the other Great Passover comes, which would liberate the faithful from the enslaving of the devil. When went to cross the Red Sea, the devil again who was ruling in his kingdom and was ruling over Pharaoh, saw that he could destroy more people, as it usually happens many times, and he made the Egyptians hunting the Hebrew people who were leading by God to freedom. Their punishment was absolute fair, because they saw so many things happening and although they thought were coming from God, they didn't submit to the Highest, and while wanted to kill them, fairly were sunk in the Red Sea.

Let see the ten plagues.

1   Blood. (7:20

2   Frogs (8:6)

3   Lice (8:17)

4   Flies (8:24)

5   Livestock diseased (9:6)

6   Boils (9:10)

7   Hail (9:23)

8   Locusts (10:13)

9   Darkness (10:22)

10 Death of firstborn (12:29)

      In this part of the book there is also something very noticeable. God Himself liberated the Hebrews by His holy way, and of course Lord didn't say to the slaves, take your weapons and kill the Egyptians. He didn't tell them; I give them into your hands, or take the weapons to fight with faith to Me, and you will win the battle, and be liberated. Because the Good God never ever acts unjustly, and never ever says to the people to become killers, and especially to kill innocent children. And after all these, they wrote about genocides, they wrote about slaughters of children and other terrible crimes, and for all these, they wrote that were acting by God's orders. God they said, told them not to leave anyone alive, even children, because they were corrupted pagans, while themselves who were murderers, were holy people! They were the "St. felons".  Unfortunately, where the people run, the devil runs also, and yes, in his corrupted kingdom he has his own ways to make appear all those unholy writings as Word of God.          

     Before we go to the Law subject, we should see another very interesting part in the book of Numbers. The book of Exodus and Numbers are almost the same book, because both speak in some areas correctly and in some other falsify about the facts in the desert. So in the book of Numbers chapter 21, 5, it is written that the people spoke against God and against Moses and said.

    Why you have brought us up of Egypt to die in the wilderness? For there is no food and no water, and we loathe this miserable food.

      In the continuation writes that God was "irritated and sent flaming snakes" to bite them, and many people died from the snakes. The people went after to Moses, and told him. We are sinners because we spoke against God and against you, now please ask God to take away from us the snakes. After it is written, that God said to Moses, make for your self a flaming snake and put it on a wood, and whomever the snake has bitten, the time he looks, he will live. So Moses according to the writing, made a copper snake and set it on a wood, and if that snake used to bite someone at the time when he looks at it, he lives. In this story, or rather not to the falsified story, but in Moses actions to lift the copper snake on a wood, the Lord was mentioned.

In the Gospel of John chapter 3, 14, Lord said to Nicodemus, and as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so much the Son of Man will be lifted up.     

       But as we see, even this story of the desert with the snakes is falsified. For what kind of flaming snakes did they write about?  And how would it be possible for the copper snake to bite them? Let us see how we interpret this story. As it is known, in the desert there are a lot of snakes and usually they hide in the sand. So it seems at some place some people been bitten by the snakes and some of them died, and others were afraid that may die from the snakes. Well certainly they spoke against God, there is no doubt about that, and then they interpreted the fact of the snakes that God sent to bite them. Of course there is no word, certainly God didn't send them, if somebody sent them that was the devil, and not of course God.        

      But it seems they used to bring a copper snake from Egypt and some used to worship it. This happening in combination with the snakes that bit them, was revealed to Moses. Moses was very upset and took the copper snake; he set it on a wood, set fire with some flaming material, and lifted it up so they may see it. In other words he burned their idol, and told them that if someone looked at this flaming snake idol, and rejects this repulsive idol, which was the symbol of the devil, God would protect him and cure from the snakebite. So Moses lifted up the snake on wood, by the meaning that he burned and hanged symbolical the cursed from God. The Lord also was lifted up from the servants of the devil on a wood, because the Lord was the rejection of the devil. The Blessed by God is the cursed by the devil. And as Moses the servant of God, hanged symbolical on wood the cursed from God, the same also the servants of the devil hanged on wood the Blessed by God. So their perception that he who was hanged on wood, criminal or even the innocent, was cursed from God was the result of their ignorance and misunderstanding. Other things Moses used to say and meant, and other things they understood.