Secrets of the Bible
|
|
This critique
is against some writings of the Bible that blaspheme God.
IS NOT
against the people of Israel. I am a friend not an enemy of people of Israel!
EXODUS
An Exodus presupposes an entrance.
Entrance into a house, life, passion,
sin that leads to slavery, and an exodus that presupposes faith to God,
and strong will to struggle. The entrance into slavery started
by an evil commercial act, the selling of Joseph, and the entrance into sin that
enslaves the soul, starts by
similar acts and choices. Every day we sell and betray our brothers for our own interests, passions, and so we are all look like the
hard brothers of Joseph. By doing so we enchain ourselves. But again, the exodus,
the breaking of chain, is not an easy task, it presupposes our strong will
and endeavour that often is a struggle that last for the rest of our lives. We certainly need God's help to do it; help that presupposes to
ask for, for the reason that the act of asking for help; it
is the main part of our will to struggle.
The 40 years wandering in the desert
symbolizes also a generation or a middle average of life, in which we wander and
prepare ourselves to enter the Promise Land. The desert precedes the Promise
Land, and so, we all less or more live in the desert.
Every one lives into desert, because wherever the creeping mind (the Devil) dominates it becomes desert and
hell. The true Promised Land is not of course a piece of land, a grave of
two meters for which often brothers kill one another
to share it. The true Promised Land is the spiritual Creation of God.
And again, on the earth, the desert is the one that
exists and prevails, and so,
in this desert, exist a lot of
problems, injustice, diseases, pain and sufferings
for all the people, and when someone has faith, must fight back every day in
order to beat his negative nature,
which negative nature is the domination of the
Devil.
The manna symbolizes a logical frugality. A
belly-slave loses easily the power to struggle, while excessive eating and
too many necessities, are also a kind of enslaving. But of course, it is not
only the allegorical meaning that comes out from this book. Beside the laws,
there is also the literal story, and the traditional perceptions of the writers
as well. So I will try to see the book in general. Is there perhaps someone who
believes to the Creator of the universe, and doesn't believe
that the Almighty Creator has the power to keep a
nation 40 years in the desert? Certainly there is no one. Let see then the
various parts of the book.
There is no need
to repeat again
that all these writings are
not belonging to Moses. Besides they didn't hide it. If all were Moses'
writings, then at least it would have been his personal narration quoting what
he did or said. Moses wouldn't write what Moses did, or what God told him and
what he answered. At least the writers inform
indirectly the reader that the last author, or rather the finisher one
was someone else, or more
than one, not Moses
himself. Certainly they had Moses' writings
or at least some of them, and as usual they added their own, and by
using other traditional perceptions related to gods as well, they "completed" the book!
But I think it is
required a quick parenthesis. A lot of people believe that
this book, and all the others as well,
have been entirely confirmed by the Holy Spirit,
while the Apostles mentioned about
in some parts of the books. Of course they were not
occupied with those ugly writings of the Old Testament, but from some of their
scattered phrases, we may think that indeed they (maybe) believed that all the
writings were direct revelations of God, and all expressed His Will. I say
maybe, which means not sure at all. Especially we notice it at the epistles of
Paul, who seems to
accept the entire of the Old Testament as divine inspired,
confirming also the depreciation
of the woman as God's "Will".
Well, as we
comprehend,
the depreciation of the woman, which was the result of the historic and social circumstances, served social necessities in barbarian
conditions, to be order in families by helping
to keep united the couple, when
love and cohesion were absent. So Apostle Paul,
served either in his knowledge, or in his ignorance
(inevitable ignorance because of the circumstances) the Will of God
to keep families united, so he served social necessities.
We also read some other words as for
example, Luke wrote in the Gospel the genealogy of the nation as it was
registered by the state officials, which started from the symbolic first created
of the holy inspired Prophet Moses. So a lot of religious
people believe all the writings have been confirmed by the
Holy Spirit, something, which is absolute mistaken. And let us ask a question. The
Apostles also believed the end
of the world would come in their time! Did perhaps the Holy Spirit
reveal to them some thing like this? Not of course.
And it is not only this, there is a lot of other inevitable
and understandable mistakes due to the historic circumstances as well.
Well, yes, the Holy Spirit inspired them in some areas,
when they had to write some God's messages, and
been reminded about the teaching of the Lord, but certainly
not in everything they wrote. God let them also write
as natural humans, as eyewitnesses, as
historians and as humans of their time, who had been taught that all writings of
the Old Testament had been written according the Will of God. That was the one
and real side of the truth, and that was what they knew. The other side is that
many writers of the Bible, not
inspired Prophets, wrote a lot of parts, or rather
wrote the most parts of the Bible
(Old Testament) in the name of the Lord; they put their
additions on top and between the writings of all the
Prophets, and presented everything as the Will of God.
But of course, their
writings were not according His Will. Actually in many areas they wrote clear
foolishnesses that reflect ignorance and
confusion. For example, they wrote that God wanted sacrifices
to enjoy the pleasant smell, or was walking ahead to find for them suitable places to camp, and according to them, Moses
told them to carry a little shovel to cover their excrements because God they said was walking in the camp,
etc. We will see all these in
the following subjects.
Well, even if the Apostles new everything,
something which is incorrect,
but even so, it was not time
for critique and elucidation of the writings. If it was, then the Lord Himself would do it; the Lord would elucidate the meanings
of the prophecies and symbols. But He did not, the opposite
He did,
He also spoke symbolic in many areas! Further more, when they asked the
Lord, when all these will happen, the Lord said, it is not for you to know these
things. So it was not the time to elucidate the writings, and therefore Lord
or the Holy Spirit wouldn't tell them the writing
of Moses speak symbolic, or which ones were inspired by God, and
which are not. Briefly, the Apostles were natural witnesses in what they heard
and saw, and also inspired when had to write
other messages of God. They were also people of their time;
some of their opinions and most of their knowledge
belonged to their time.
They had absolute faith and trust to
God, and while they couldn't reject or criticize all those criminal activities
that appeared as Word of God, certainly were trying not to think about them at
all, while thee Lord didn't say
directly anything about these
writings, but His teaching was not matching
with them. There was an opposition in a lot of
silent questions, a silent mystery, because it was not the time, and
so God didn't allow the elucidation of the symbols,
and the critique on all those crimes, which occurred on His name. The truth will
shine at the correct time. And again, if the Apostles understood all the symbols
of the book of Genesis, and of the other prophecies and interpreted them, then
simply, there would be no reason to be written. There would be
no reason for the book of Revelation
to be written as well. Everything would be written
straight, literal, direct, but as we realize, the opposite has happened. Why?
Because of very complicated plans and strategies of the Lord.
So let see the book of Exodus. According
the writings, after the death of Joseph, the people of Israel continued to live
peacefully in their new country. They increased a lot, and enjoyed the same
rights as the Egyptians, until a new king took over, who no longer recognized
Joseph. Clearly they meant, the new king did not recognize
any longer the rights of the Hebrews, and according the writings it happened about
300 years later. It is written, the new king was afraid that the Hebrews might
get united with the enemies of Egypt, and fight against them. So he converted them into slaves, and placed superintendents to
depress them.
He also did something very evil. Because he
was afraid the Hebrews could increase more in population, and would be
a threat for his country, gave orders to kill all the male children and let alive
only the girls. Now the question is, what was the reason that made the king to
be so harsh, and what enemies was he afraid for? The
Egyptian sources mention about some pastoral people who
were
called Yksos.
The name means royal shepherds or shepherds of the king. It is unknown why they
had this name, but according the Egyptian sources, it was not that people who
leaved Egypt
with Moses, or Osarshif, as the Egyptian callend
him. The Egyptian did not identify the Yksos with the Hebrews slaves
liberated by Moses and by the
power of God.
Finally, the Yksos
were defeated and enforced to
depart from Egypt.
So the king was afraid the
Hebrews would join the Yksos
attempting to fight against Egyptians. Anod it
seems some Hebrews had
joined already with the Yksos, and fought
against Egypt. So they gave justification to the king to abolish all of their
rights converting them into slaves. Of course he needed slaves, but also was
afraid of them, while he new very well by
converting them into slaves, they had serious reasons to hate him. So he set the
bosses to depress them, and avoiding
further problems by their increasing, gave orders to kill the male children.
So Moses survived from that slaughter
by the known way. That is why king's sister called him
Moses. The name means someone who emerged from water. The Baptized. So Moses
grew up as Egyptian in the palace.
According the Egyptian sources, his name was
Osarshif, and was a priest of Osiris. But it seems this name was rather a title
of the priest, or maybe it was another name given to him by the Egyptians.
Probably, someone who emerged from the water didn't sound as a real name. It
seems also Moses under inspiration kept this name as a symbolic one. However,
his name was Moses, and the slaves who been delivered into freedom were not the same people who invaded Egypt and called them Yksos. But as
he grew up as an Egyptian and as a prince, it is rather correct
he was indeed for some time priest of Osiris.
It seems also his mother or his brother met him at some time, and
revealed to him the secret and then he left behind
everything and went to Median. Of course it is written that he killed an
Egyptian, and that is why he left. But this is a rather a made up story, or it
was mentioned about somebody else. According to the written word, he saw two Hebrew
slaves fighting, and he said to the one, why do you strike your brother? And the other told him, who are you to tell me what to do!
Do you want to kill me as you killed the Egyptian? According to them, a slave
spoke like this to the Egyptian prince, (who are you), which doesn't sound
logical at all. Even if Moses killed someone, he could
easily justify the crime by various ways, and could
even punish the one who spoke to him like this.
So it seems the correct
is: the king was informed that Moses was a son of Hebrews, and his sister
deceived him. That is why Moses went away to Median. There he married Zippo rah
who was one of the daughters of Jeetho. I have no reasons to doubt about this,
and besides who was his wife wouldn't make any difference. For other things we have serious
reasons to doubt, while a lot of writings mentioned to God, not matching at all with God, neither do with the great
Prophet.
So according to the writings of chapter 3, Moses was pasturing the sheep of his father in law
at the back place of the desert, and came or rather he went up the mountain
Hereby, which as they wrote it was "the mountain of
God"!! Does God live on mountains? Not of course. But gods
"used to live on mountains", as the Olympian gods "did"... Well,
obviously
a lot of writings reflect the ignorance and the
traditional perceptions of the writers. It is not Moses who speaks here; there are some
others, and again the last of them were some others, and rather only the first
of them based on Moses' writings. So an Angel appeared on the mountain
Hereby, as
flame of fire in a blackberry bush, and while the fire was in the bush, the bush
was not consumed. Moses said to himself, let turn and
see this marvellous thing, and when he turned, he
heard the voice of God. (From inside the bush?).
They also wrote the first thing that God asked Moses was
to take off
his sandals. Well, why should he take out his shoes
for? Is there perhaps any logic, reason, to make us understand, why Moses
shouldn't wear shoes on that mountain? Yes there was logic, and the logic or
rather the perception was in the confused brains of the writers. That mountain
or some other one that was perplexed with the mountain
Hereby was a similar one to the mountain
Olympus, on which according the public faith, used to live some gods. At the chapter 19: 12, 13,
it is written that God told to Moses, you
order the people to stay around the mountain and don't
touch it, otherwise they would be killed by stones and
arrows. According to them, God would kill the people by
stones and arrows! So we understand how much confused they were!
Who was fighting by stones and arrows?
Those who were fighting
by stones and arrows were of course the tribal leaders
before they die and been deified. So we see very
clearly traditional perception related to traditional gods
attached in the book of Exodus. The traditions declared, that mountain or
some other one, for which they perplexed with the mountain Hereby, was the
mountain of the gods, and as it is known, those gods as long lived as tribal
leaders, used to walk barefooted, because simply, they had no
shoes to wear. So this traditional perception remained
enforcing anyone who would go close to a mountain like this to take off his shoes.
The gods live
up to the mountain, and so there was a
"mystery" and fear as well around that mountain, and
because
those gods before die were going around barefooted, so everyone should
imitate them and pay respect. This is the only way to interpret this paradox.
Certainly God didn't tell him to take off his shoes. Why
would God demand something
like this? If what the human makes for his life were unholy and contagious for
God, then the Lord would demand to take out his cloths as
well. If only the shoes were unholy because walked on various
unclean places, then and the barefooted feet would be also unholy. Because his
shoes were already up on the mountain, and so wear them or not
wouldn't make any difference.
But those people were confused with their
traditional gods. When Lord was walking on the earth was of course dressed and
wear sandals; He never said it was a sin or lack of respect for the people to wear their basic cloths
and shoes. So we see very clearly traditional perceptions appearring as the Word of God, and
as we know, even in our time
there are a lot of religious people
around who take off their shoes in the temples,
believing it is unholy to wear shoes, but do not consider as unholy to kill
people!!
The other paradox is the "objections" of Moses and his
"refusal" to obey God. God said to Moses, and Moses said to God! It is very surprising,
astonishing to hear that the Creator of the
universe had a conversation with a human being, and the human, the earthly creature, heard God's voice with his ears, was
answering to God, and yes, was refusing to obey! According to them, Moses "disagreed" with the suggestions of God, he
"did not agree" with God, (!!!)
he demanded explanations, he disputed the correctness of God's decisions,
and therefore he was blaspheming His Wisdom. It sounds like he was saying to
God; did You think correctly what is going to happen if I do what You ask me?
And according to them, God was listening his objections and was trying to make
him obedient. God they said was very angry because Moses refused to obey. So
according to them Moses was disobedient and audacious. Not of course. The
Prophet was not disobedient and audacious; the writers were those who
were confused.
Certainly this conversation was not between
God and Moses; it clearly
reflects a conversation between an old chief with another almost equal. Those
gods, as long were alive, had similar eccentricities, and would
disagree one another and argue, and say yes and no, and so they presented Moses in the same way, by disagreeing and arguing with God,
and saying no, and demanding explanations like they were equal and could sometimes give advise even to God.
But over across these paradoxes, the Revelation of the Highest to Moses was a great fact. This
voice of the Lord by the first heard words, I Am, and this miscomprehension for that time I Am, and even only this,
it is enough to prove the truly of the ancient holy
inspired Bible. As much they winded up with a lot of traditional perceptions,
and as much didn't understand the meaning of I Am, it shines
more that the sun, and the divine Light blinds the foolish and arrogant, and makes the
wise and pious to shine and rejoice. Lord mentioned and concealed this great Revelation saying, God spoke to Moses as God of the
living people, and not as God of the dead. We glorify the Highest God. The Almighty Lord said; I Am that I Am. I Am the God of
Abraham, of Isaac and Jacob. Some people give various meanings on this "name" of God. But it is not a name at all. God, the
Supreme Mind has no name.
The names
belong and match to the limited creatures, never to the Highest Creator. Lord revealed Himself by the words,
I Am that I Am, I
Am the God of the live pious and just people, and He is not belonging to the time and space. The Lord is not belonging to the past
or the future, is always Present, I Am. The ancient writers, who lived in
circumstantial conditions of ignorance, couldn't
comprehend what God meant by the word I Am, but unfortunately, not even many
modern people didn't want to comprehend this great meaning, they didn't want to
understand that at least at that time it was impossible to be human's invention.
They didn't try by their wise yards to comprehend the messages of the prophecies, to combine them all together and
solve the divine puzzle, and have the proofs of God.
I consider also the burning bush symbolizes the human soul. No, I don't think it was an Angel who appeared
(I mean the Angel appeared but not in the burning bush)
in the burning blackberry
bush; rather it was a symbolic bush, not a literal one. The blackberry bush the so much thorny, and also perplexed and inaccessible
which blossoms and makes so delicious berries, somewhere is related with the human soul. The soul is also about the same way
confused, perplexed in the kingdom of the reptile,
though the Spirit of the Highest vivifying it, inflaming without burning it, so
it might blossom and produce those holy spiritual fruit that direct the soul in the Arms of the Highest Father. So, I consider, the
burning and not burning bush in some way was reflecting the soul of Moses. When Moses saw this image and heard the holy voice, then
he understood, he felt, that the bush was his soul, in which recognized the Appearance and the voice of the Highest. Then he
understood who was the One who spoke to him, because while was just and pious, often felt within him the same Holy Voice to speak,
he felt the same holy fire in his soul, the one that was burning/inflaming but
no burning.
There is also
written another paradox. They wrote when Moses left the mountain Hereby, he went
to his father in law, and told him he had decided to return to Egypt to find out if his brothers were still alive. After they wrote
that God told him to return to Egypt, because those who wanted to kill him were already dead. The very paradox is this one. While
Moses was going his way to Egypt, he stopped somewhere to have a rest, and God met him in purpose to kill him, because he didn't
circumcise his son! So God sent him to liberate the slaves, and according to them, God also met him to kill him for the reason that
he didn't circumcise his son! Well, the circumcision was the
"most important", (!!!) and he was lucky enough, because Zippo
rah took a sharp stone and circumcised her
son, and threw it in front of his feet. Whose feet? It is not known whose feet they meant. And then
Zippo rah said.
You are indeed a bridegroom of blood to me. You are a bridegroom of blood
because of the circumcision! Exodus, 4: 25.
And then went away. Who went away? Rather
they meant God went away from Moses. And Zippo rah repeated saying, you are
bridegroom of blood because of the circumcision. Now what is the meaning of all
these illogicality? Did perhaps God change His decisions, or God appeared as a
ghost pretending as if He wanted to kill Moses? Where is the logic in these
writings? If the circumcision were by God's order, then Lord wouldn't tell Moses
during the burning bush and while, as they said,
God had a conversation with Moses? Why didn't God say to Moses; you go first and circumcise your son. So God would confirm, that
the circumcision is His Will. Was it possible to appear after like a phantom to kill Moses after already giving him instructions,
which Moses had to serve? Not of course!
So we see
again this relation
with God, (you are bridegroom of blood for me
by the circumcision) reflect that primitive perception about bridegrooms of
blood, and the relation of blood they had with the gods. The gods were
everywhere present in their life and emphasized their
racial prestige. The gods continually were for them relatives of blood, were the
distant deified ascenders, and could not forget them. Who knows what did the holy inspired Prophet write relative, or what did he
write about the Bridegroom who would come to the world, and what exactly he wrote about the relation of His Blood with the enslaved
human!...
Under those circumstances it was very
difficult to be liberated from the
traditional perceptions about gods, and as a result of this, they
had similar perceptions about God
as well. Idle talk continues with the further "disputes between God and
Moses" on whom they loaded a thousand of sins, and according to them it was "difficult"
for God to finally convince Moses to conform. Elsewhere again they wrote that God made hard the heart of Pharaoh, and made him to be
disobedient, because as they wrote, God wanted to show His power to the world. The creation itself reveals how powerful is the
Creator, but in their ignorance they tell us that God "was acting fraudulently" to show His power!!
We read in astonishment and indignation that God was doing such things and
everything. According to them, God caused the wounds,
and also God hardened Pharaoh's heart
in order to be disobedient! According to them, God "was doing" everything bad, every evil, and everything
holy and unholy. And then what did Pharaoh do? How was
he guilty? While, and according to them, he was doing whatever God enforced
him to do! What did those people write!
There is many more illogicality that is better to ignore. Let us see the miracles and the
messages of God. The first miracle was with the snakes. But this miracle seems also to be falsified. We also see that the conversion
of the stick into a snake happened at the second visiting to Pharaoh. It is written that at the first visiting Moses and Aaron said
to Pharaoh, that God asked him to let the slaves go to the desert, to offer sacrifices to God.
And afterward
Moses and Aaron came and said to Pharaoh, Thus says the Lord, the God of Israel,
let My people go that they may celebrate a feast to Me in the wilderness. Exodus
5:1
That means
they did not say the truth!!
So, according to them, not only Moses but also God
attempted to deceive
Pharaoh! If they at least said that God asked Pharaoh through His Prophet to liberate the slaves, they would
be in borders that match with God. How could something like this be possible?
Would ever God try and in vain to deceive
Pharaoh? Was it possible for the Almighty and Omniscient Creator to act in this unholy way? Not of course. They also said, that
this miracle with the snakes occurred in purpose to impress Pharaoh. So according to them, God wanted to impress Pharaoh!
But let us see how we understand this miracle and what
Moses rather wrote about. It seems rather
clear, at the first visiting Moses and Aaron said to Pharaoh, that it was God's demand to liberate the slaves, but Pharaoh
refused. And not only refused, but because he wanted to prove that he was also
a god and the ruler of his country, he gave orders to
depress more the slaves. In another words he was provoking God,
trying to prove he was a god too,
as usual. So he gave orders to depress the slaves, resulting to turn
them against God and against His Prophet. The snake was in his kingdom, and as
usual was trying to cause confusion and turn even the descendents of Abraham
against God. At the second visit Moses warned Pharaoh saying, a curse would come in his country with terrible wounds if he didn't obey God. Of course God knew what would happen, and knew
how far the catastrophic mania of the devil would take over Pharaoh.
It seems that Moses told him the sovereignty in Egypt was the one of a snake. It was the
sovereignty of the Devil. And to prove it, he rather asked him to throw his royal sceptre on the ground. And as Pharaoh was curious,
he threw it down, and surprising
realized that it was converted into a snake. But of course he didn't obey,
while his priests told him it was a common fakir
trick, and also the spirit of the diabolical sceptre (the sovereignty of the
reptilian mind) was of its nature catastrophic. The
Devil from his nature
in general to destroy
influenced Pharaoh to be disobedient, because by been disobedient he would cause
destructions, and that is exactly what satisfies the Devil. That is how we can
interpret this conversion, not the stick of Moses, but rather the sceptre of
Pharaoh was the one that was converted into a snake. The sceptre was the symbol
of the symbolic snake, and rather it looked like a snake also. So he who
hardened the heart of Pharaoh was certainly that
reptilian mind, which
always is evil, and always wants to destroy people.
Moses was going to Pharaoh holding
his stick, and every time he didn't obey, Moses was lifting up his stick against
the sovereignty of the snake and of Pharaoh, and every time caused some curse
against Egypt. So we understand the wounds that stroke Egypt did not come from God, but the provoking and arrogant behaviour of Pharaoh in front of
the Creator, and his refusal to obey, caused the curse, and therefore the curse, meaning the total aversion of God in front of the
provoking and arrogant refusal Pharaoh, had untied the hands of the
Devil, and he had absolute freedom to act and satisfy himself.
Certainly he would not lose
so great an opportunity. It was a great opportunity for him, in which by the
aversion of God, the balance was mostly lost, and it was turning
on behalf of the Devil. So he could
have the right to destroy, and whom he destroys does
not make any
difference, it is good enough to destroy, and besides he destroys everybody who obeys him.
As we understand better our beloved Creator, and as we understand by
hearing the Silent Bible, and
interpreting the book of Revelation, every evil that exists in the creation
originated from the symbolic snake and his interpositions. And the
wounds that stroke Egypt are
clearly sights and emanations of the reptilian mind of the creation.
Every evil is his createurea,
every evil is his emanation, the Gread
Dragon
is the one that moves every evil, because simply, it
belongs to him. God never punish unjustly anyone,
never pretends, and never hardens the heart of anyone. And if
the Lord takes lives, the lives are not destroyed,
while the Lord is the Master of life, and always He has the first and the last word
on the soul of every human.
Now of course someone would ask, why all these things
had to occur, and why did
God ask Pharaoh
to liberate the slaves? For it would be very easy for God to gather the slaves all together at one place and drive them to the
freedom, ignoring what Pharaoh wanted or not. What could
Pharaoh do, and again, why did the Almighty
Creator ask or ordered him to
liberate the slaves, while Lord had of course all the power to liberate them? Well, this is a complicated secret that only partly
could be understood. If the slaves were really holy people, if they had real faith to God, and if indeed were seeking God with deeds
and word, which means if they were really worthy, then God would liberate them without any problem. But as
it is obviously, the slaves were obstinate, not only in Egypt, but even in the desert. After all those miracles, the only thing they wanted was to have good life
and didn't care much in what God wanted. So to be liberated, the scale of justice should
be turnend
on behalf of them. They
were unfaithful and enough corrupted as well, therefore the Devil
laid claim on
them, the reptile could insist
they were belonging to him, while their behaviour was
bad and evil, and these things belongs to the
Devil.
The Devil accuses the people
when do the wrong, while by
acting evilly choosee the Devil, and so are belonging
to him. But the Blood of the Lamb atones people and makes us worthy to
God. The Christian Passover, meaning the passing from the enslaving of the
Devil in the atonement and liberation, which makes people
worthy to God, occurred through the Crucifixion and Resurrection of the Lord. We can have atonement through the Blood of the Lamb.
But how could the obstinate slaves have atonement? The Devil said they belonged to him. But by making Pharaoh to refuse, he caused
a lot of ruins and sufferings to innocent people, something that was satisfying him, and also unknowingly contributed
to make the slaves to wake up, and seek God and become
obedient to His Prophet. So the justice turned towards them, and then God
liberated them.
The same is true with the story of the angel of death. This
satisfaction of the Devil by
killing innocent people, contributed also for the liberation of the slaves. But
God is the absolute Master of the innocent souls, and of all the unjust
murdered. When Lord was born, the reptile killed again innocent children, as he
wanted to satisfy himself and take revenge, because Lord came into the foreign
world to liberate people from the Devil. (He came to His own, but His own didn't
receive Him.) Because the majority of the people are being submitted to the
sovereignty of the devil.
Unfortunately, the
Devil has rights
in the world in which he rules, and for the people to be belong to God, the
just must turn towards their salvation. It is very difficult to comprehend the
absolute Just and Holy Creator; there are a lot of secrets, which some time will
be revealed. The blood as a cross on the doors was exactly the symbol of the
Crucified Saviour. Moses told them they should fasting for 14 days, two weeks, and the 14th day to kill the lamb
or the goat kid, and set on the doors the symbol of the cross. Not of course for the angel of death to see the blood and overpass
that door, because the angel wouldn't know. No. But the angel of death had no right in the house on which was the symbol of the
cross. It was the symbol of the victory for the liberation of the slaves.
The Passover was the passing to
liberation from the bounds of slavery, and should celebrate every year, so this
event may remain in their memory. It was to remember their liberation from the
bonds of slavery, until the other Great Passover comes, which would liberate the
faithful from the enslaving of the Devil. When went to cross the Red Sea, the
Devil again who was ruling in his kingdom and was ruling over Pharaoh, saw that
he could destroy more people, as it usually happens many times, and
so he made the
Egyptians hunting the Hebrew people who been leading
by God to freedom. Their punishment was absolute fair, because they saw so many
things happening and although they thought were coming from God, they didn't
submit to the Highest, and while wanted to kill them, fairly were
drowned in the Red Sea.
Let see the ten plagues.
1 Blood. (7:20
2 Frogs (8:6)
3 Lice (8:17)
4 Flies (8:24)
5 Livestock diseased (9:6)
6 Boils (9:10)
7 Hail (9:23)
8 Locusts (10:13)
9 Darkness (10:22)
10 Death of firstborn (12:29)
In this part of the book there is
also something very noticeable. God Himself liberated the Hebrews by His holy
way, and of course Lord did not say to the slaves, take your weapons and kill the
Egyptians. He did not tell
them; I give the Egyptians into your hands, or fight by faith to Me, and you will win the battle, and be
liberated. No He did not, bbecause
Lord God never ever acts unjustly, and never ever
orders people to become killers, especially to
kill innocent children. And after all these, they wrote about genocides, they wrote about slaughters of children and other terrible
crimes, and for all these, they wrote straight and clearly
they were acting by God's orders!!
God they said, told them to let no
one alive, even
children, because they were corrupted pagans, while themselves who were murderers
of babies, were holy people! They were the "St. felons".
Unfortunately, wherever people run, the
Devil runs
too, and in his corrupted kingdom he has his own ways to make
appear all those unholy writings as Word of God.
Before go to Law subject, we should see
another very interesting part in the book of Numbers. In the book of Numbers chapter 21:
5, it is written the people spoke against God and against Moses
saying.
Why you have brought us up of Egypt to die in the wilderness? For there is no food and no water,
and we loathe this miserable food.
Further it writes God
was "irritated and sent flaming snakes" to bite them,
resulting many people died from the snakes.
After that ppeople went to Moses
saying: we are sinners because we spoke against
God and against you, now please ask God to take away from us the snakes. After
it is written, God said to Moses, make for your self a flaming snake and put it on a wood, and whomever the snake has bitten,
at the time he looks, he will live. So according the writing,
Moses made a copper snake and set it on a wood, and if
snake bite someone at the time when he looks at it, he lives. In this story, or
rather not to theis falsified story, but in Moses actions to
lift the copper snake on a wood, the Lord was mentioned about.
In the Gospel of John chapter 3, 14, Lord said to Nicodemus: and as Moses lifted up the
serpent in the wilderness, even so much the Son of Man will be lifted up.
Well, as we see, even this story of the desert with the snakes is falsified. For what
kind of flaming snake did they write about? Let us see how
can we interpret this story. As it is known, in the desert there are a lot of snakes
that usually hide in the sand. So it seems at some
place some people had been bitten by snakes and some of them died, and others were
afraid that might die from the snakes. Well certainly
they spoke against God, there is no doubt about that, and then they interpreted
the fact of the snakes that God sent to bite them. Of course there is no word,
certainly God did not send
them, if somebody sent snakes, it
was the
reptile who did it, it was the snake, not of course God.
But it seems they
brought a copper snake from Egypt and some of them
worship it. This happening in combination with the snakes that
bit them, was revealed to Moses. Moses was very upset and took the copper snake;
he set it on a wood, set fire by some flaming material, and lifted it up so they might
see it. In other words he burned their idol, and told them that if
someone looked at this flaming snake idol, and rejects this repulsive idol,
which was the symbol of the Devil, God would protect him and cure
him from the snakebite. (besides
the sin is actually metaphorically a "snakebite") So Moses lifted
up the snake on wood, by the meaning he burned and hanged
metaphoric the cursed
of God.
The Lord also was lifted up
from the servants of the Devil on a wood, because the
Lord was the rejection of the Devil. The Blessed by God is the cursed by the
Devil. And as Moses the servant of God, hanged metaphoric
on wood the cursed
by God, the same also the servants
of the Devil hanged on wood the Blessed by God. So their perception that he who
was hanged on wood, criminal or even innocent, was cursed by
God was the result of their ignorance and misunderstanding. Other things Moses
said and meant, and other things they understood.
Now as for the falsified story of Balaam and Balk related with the donkey that was "speaking" there is no reason to comment.
Obviously this story is unrelated with Moses and the conditions of the desert. This story, which is mixed up with myths and traditional perceptions
rather belongs to the time of Judges. The Lord mentioned
about Balaam and Balak in the book of Revelation. Balaam used to teach
Balak how to put stumbling block before the sons of Israel,
making them to eat
food sacrificed to idols and to commit acts
of immorality. But how could
they eat things sacrificed to idols in the desert, while
never had this kind of food? As it is written, they were eating for 40 years only manna
and quails! So, obviously they mixed up
everything, and as we will see at the continuation with a lot of contradictions and misunderstandings, this story, which is also
connected with terrible crimes, has nothing to do with the Prophet Moses.
|
