Secrets of the Bible
|
|
The Sacrifice of Isaac
As
I believe! The origin of
sacrifice was the off-spring of a primitive belief.
"Primitive" tribes believed that the
spirits of dead need to eat, drink, or at least
as spirit would enjoy the shooting smell
of burning fat. The origin of circumcision was rather
the Neolithic or so Age. This seems mostly clear while,
according the writings, God "told them" to
make stone knives and perform circumcision. Obviously, stone
knives refer to stone age. Those traditions used to influence all
tribes and nations, including
of course Israel. As we read in the story of
Abraham, although it was rewritten many centuries after Abraham and after Moses,
still bring up that the Angels of God ate veal and butter. In the story of Jacob
and Esau, Jacob saw his brother like a face of god, further
more we read that God "demanded" sacrifices
for various reasons, and also to "enjoy" the
shooting smell.
Exactly like the tribal leaders did before die.
Beside
animal, used to sacrifice humans as well. The origin of this terrible
tradition was the position of the first-born son. While was first, was very
closed to his father, and so, he inherited his father's experience and position
when father die. From some circumstantial
factors and rather
by the dreams, prevailed the belief that
the dead father sometimes wanted to have with him his first-born son. There was also the unwritten law of the tribal leader for the
first-born son to inherit, but for the primitives, the first-born inherited only the position of his father and his weapon as well,
while there were not yet any private properties to inherit. At very posterior times, this unwritten law that remained as law of
those deified fathers, and as law of God, caused
serious problems of great appositions and discords, mainly among rich people,
who were great owners and also brothers. Only the first-born had the right to
inherit, while the second not only didn't inherit anything, but also was
enforced to become slave of his brother!
So the belief that the dead
father "wanted" his first-born son, was the origin of human sacrifice, and
because they thought the dead needed service and food,
prevailed the other
belief
that became tradition, not only to sacrifice animals but also to bury sometimes the wife and slaves, as well
as food and water. Even in recent times there still exist some remnants of this
tradition, where boiled wheat is offered in the
memorial services, and it share between the mourners
so might bless and forgive the dead,
and also watering the tomb of dead. As it was following this tradition was extended in terrible dimensions in times of very dark
conditions, and so used to sacrifice people for
various intentions. In the books of Law the death penalty apply to anyone who
sacrificed to Molochs, which rather looked like a pig,
(deification of the pig), while all
sacrifices on that "god" were human sacrifices. The Moabites and Ammonites used to
worship that terrible "god" who according the perception "used to ask" for human
sacrifices, and especially children. They used to set fire until becomes very hot, and then put in its horrible arms some unfortunate child
as an offering to the devil-god.
All tribes went through similar
conditions including of course the Semitic tribes. In more advanced and
development levels they were rejecting the human sacrifice, thinking more
humane that the gods love the
people and want no more people sacrificed. By the
opportunity it is I think worthy to look briefly the sacrifice of Iphigenia. In
Homer's writing we read that goddess Artemis was very upset because the king
Agamemnon killed her "holy deer", and this occasion
of revenge or punishment informs us also to what
other kind of cases the gods "wanted'
human sacrifices. The deer at the far back
times was a totem of some tribes, in which the goddess Artemis was
living. Whoever killed a deer it was like committing a crime, and the
goddess demanded punished.
The same goddess certainly was before the chosen wife of some tribal leader. Homer,
who seems was against the human sacrifices, wrote about times, when people started to reject this terrible custom.
The deer was still a totem, but the goddess lived no longer
in it. The goddess was reshaped into
a natural force, she was the goddess of the wind. But rather she was
imported goddess, and because the Greeks hunted the deers, only a concrete
one belonged to Artemis, and
it was "under her protection". When they placed Iphigenia on the altar,
ready to sacrifice her, Artemis loved the alive and beautiful Iphigenia, she
care no more about her deer, people care no
longer about the deer of Artemis, they changed their decision as the goddess also did, they lifted up Iphigenia and
transferred her in goddess's temple of Tauris. Well, then she became a
priestess, or rather the correct is, she became a prostitute of priests'
"business".
Well, of course, this doesn't mean it is
about a similar case to Isaac's sacrifice. Maybe
there was some other similar story, but Moses' intention was certainly to teach his people
how to be faithful and obedient
to God, and mainly to teach that there is nothing you can put in the
place of God. So this sacrifice passes divine messages. But as we realize even
this story is falsified and adapted to that time of ignorance about God. It is
written that God wanted to test Abraham, and no more no less, they wrote that
God was feigning as if really wanted Isaac to be literal sacrificed, in purpose
to find out what Abraham would do. God they said asked Abraham to sacrifice
Isaac, and so according to them, the Lord said something did not mean it,
which means lie, and was playing as hard to find out what Abraham would do!
If it is possible! How could they know at their time that God knew the soul of
Abraham, much more than Abraham knew himself, because His Spirit goes very deep
and to "every corner" of the soul, and know very well what
every Abraham would do. But of course these writings
do not belong to Moses; certainly he never meant
something like this. Abraham thought (due to the
circumstances) he had to sacrifice Isaac, and not because
God asked him to do so. In another words, this idea was put in his mind
by the father of lie, the
symbolic snake did it, not of course God.
We read that the Angel told him, do not lay
your hand on the lad. But of course the Angel would
not tell him before
to sacrifice Isaac, would not tell him something false and
unsuitable to God, to find out what Abraham would do!
God of course never pretends, and certainly will never use a lie to find out
what the human would do. Even a wrong belief or misunderstanding would serve
sometimes God's intention. He who tempts the human is not God, but the devil.
The message of this story says; God asks you to sacrifice metaphorically your
son. Don't convert your son into your idol. Don't worship your son or your
daughter or anybody else. You should love your son with real love, but the real
love doesn't create idols. When we comprehend the Lord's teaching we also
comprehend the allegorical story of Isaac. The Lord Jesus spoke and said; if you
love your son or wife, mother, sister etc, more than Me you are not worthy of Me. Whoever put
his son in the position of God, is not worthy of God. Only God has the right to ask for something like this, no one
else. True love is disinterested, and must be offered
free, without expecting returns, because if we do expect returns, then it is not love. It is something that belongs to exchanges
and commodities. Human should love and at the same time must be free and independent.
The message says, keep away from
idols. Do not worship anything; worship only God. Do not convert any famous
"star" or any other human, or any other thing into idol; do not put your son or
your lover, neither any other materialist treasure nor any thing else in the
position of God. This is the idol, and not what people used to believe in their
ignorance. Any thing we try to put in the position of God is an idol. And the
attachment to an idol is a sick attachment to the death. Under this
condition everything related with life loses its
meaning, and only meanings related with death prevail. It
is a condition that alienates the meaning of freedom and independence; it alienates the holy meaning of the pure love.
The attachment to an idol
is an attachment to the death, but the attachment to God who is the Creator, the
Spring of life and love, the Master of life, this attachment is the spiritual
health that show the way in life, it raises the human to the higher levels that
approach the Perfection, approach God. In God there is perfect life, perfect
love, justice etc. So if I love God more than anything else, which means, I do
not put anything in the position of God, then I have perfect love, which I can
offer it freely, and so I can really love my son or my lover and anyone else without be dependent
from them and without converting them into my standing stool of my life.
In a few words, we worship only
God, not anyone else.
Love is a treasure;
it is the heart and breath of life. It
streams from the vivifying Spirits of God, and when we siphon this pure love,
then we have this spiritual treasure in our soul, and so we offer what we have,
we offer this spiritual treasure by disinterestedness
to our son and anyone else, but first with this pure love we love God, we
worship and express our thanks to the Lord, who is the Spring and Giver of the
life and the treasure of love as
well. If we do not do that, then it means we are far away from God, and so we do not siphon pure love,
we are then closer to the devil, and so we siphon other spiritual charcoals that come from the devil, which we mix them up with the
indispensable means of life that stream from the Spirits of God. Then we
are confused, we do not know where we stand and
what we want.
The real
pure love streams from the Spirits of God;
it vivifies, it shines, warms and never burns, never hurts,
never destroys. Simply, more I love God, more I have love, and more I will be
able to love my son. So the message that comes out of
Isaac's sacrifice is, love your son, but convert him not
into your idol. Don't place him in the
position of God; don't make your son your god. If as a
father, as Abraham, which means father, if you find your self in a
position that enforces you to have a choice between God and your son, then you
should sacrifice metaphorical your son. Do not "sacrifice" God. If you really
love your son, at
this case you should sacrifice him; otherwise you will be both losers.
|